oche balboa wrote:Anyone got Adams vs Waites averages. I suspect they are around early 90s.

Again? But of course, Sir!

Waites 5-4 Adams
89.25 vs 95.09

Adams really messed it up at the later stages of the legs. Should have won easily, also missed 2 singles.
First 9 darts was 113 vs 86...

Harms 5-3 Olde Kalter
91.40 vs 89.88
(88.58 vs 102.08)
5/6 vs 3/8
151 ftw vs 74

Waites 5-4 Adams
89.25 vs 95.09
5/11 vs 4/11

The act like MVG with a comp average of 105 is a new thing, when taylor had higher TV comp averages. Just look at some of his European championships records Of course they do - makes sense. That's business! MvG is now!!! Some fanboys will drink the Kool Aid. Taylor is the past. Highest ever three-d...

My computer, n01...

I think people's hatred of Taylor clouds their judgement. As for Bristow.. that imo isn't a point even worth debating. The best of his era by a mile but not even close to Taylor in his pomp or MVG. How good was Eric??? Imagine if Bristow or others from the old gang would have been covered like toda...

I think people's hatred of Taylor clouds their judgement. As for Bristow.. that imo isn't a point even worth debating. The best of his era by a mile but not even close to Taylor in his pomp or MVG. How good was Eric??? Imagine if Bristow or others from the old gang would have been covered like toda...

Social media is also helping the new kid in town. There aint many sites talking about Taylors fine achievements in detail. Today we have nearly full blown coverage, analysis and stats. Back in 2008-2010 it was just beginning... Nowadays the PDC is screaming each and every detail from the rooftops - ...

No fruking way! Great 164+170 from Mr. Durrant! Got him out of trouble, as his scoring in general was average - almost as if he only woke up for the special visits! Have to agree, his first dart just wasn't there. His first 9 dart AVE was 98.79 - usual he is in the 105-115 range. Anyway, Mr. Willia...

Jim Williams 5-3 Glen Durrant
100.49 vs 95.77
5/12 vs 3/10
61 vs 170
180s
4vs2

No fruking way! Great 164+170 from Mr. Durrant!

Kyle McKinstry 5-4 Scott Waites
89.43 vs 95.57
5/18 vs 4/17

Richard Veenstra 4-5 Michael Unterbuchner, Veenstra terrible on the doubles, missed xx for the match

Good win from Snarly!

I could write so much more about Taylor vs the field. But nowadays I am only reacting when the revisionism is getting out of hand like in this thread. In 3-4 years (maybe earlier) some will say Taylor was so overrated and maybe only top 5... :MAD: And in regard of averages - even ignoring the differ...

ChrisW wrote:

slymaster wrote:

ChrisW wrote: Ranked Majors he is 6 v 4 beating Taylor.

Why didn't you include the Worlds?

Are they not included in the ranked majors?

Not on ddb.

ChrisW wrote: Ranked Majors he is 6 v 4 beating Taylor.

Why didn't you include the Worlds?

Now I agree with you on the timing argument, but your 6 out of 10 statement is ridiculous to me. We never get the chance to really compare them, but I think MvG would have the better of him, if they were both at their best, simply because that statement in itself means they are both playing to the ...

Duneh9617 wrote: Taylor was at his best in '07.

No frucking way, Sir!

Take a closer look at 2008-2010.