What a fix the 3 Dutch lads who all travel together play on the same night! Me a cynic? Nah so what if it was? Its just scheduling after all, not really a 'fix'. Creates good TV as well, encourages DUtch supporters to come along for the night and hopefully will be a good atmosphere. Some people nee...

Paddy's Picks 7.10pm Michael van Gerwen W v Mensur Suljovic L 8.15pm Michael Mansell W v Preston Ridd L 8.45pm Terry Jenkins W v Joe Cullen L 9.50pm Jelle Klaasen W v Steve Brown L 10.55pm Vincent van der Voort L v Mansell/Ridd W The most difficult so far, Got 4 out of 5 right yesterday and once ag...

Gerard94 wrote:VVDV will also struggle against Mansell.

Cullen to take Jenkins easily.

Klaasen should beat Brown. MVG to edge Suljovic.

blimey, do you have a bit of inside info there? is Terry ill or something? WOudl be a good bet if there is real basis for that opinion. C'mon, spill the beans.

nikkiboy wrote:If the bbx need a commentator they should get hold of Part to do it, he did a great job for them before

I imagine he is [trying] flying back to Canada with his tail between his legs at the moment!

Interesting. He might be very good. Always good to try out the pros in the booth to see how they get on.
Will certainly listen with an open mind.

I agree Dave, what a load of moaning buggers on this thread!!!!

hang the dj wrote:Looking at the final vote tally nobody was even close to McCoy who in my opinion was the right choice that said to get 2nd place is a superb achievemnet for Taylor but apart from dart geeks nobody will remember that Taylor was 2nd

not convinced by that at all - he is on radio 5 as we speak!

lloyd can do whatever the hell he wants



well, thats blatantly not true is it now.

So do you think it would not have put off his opponent? (bearing in mind Colin apologised afterwards for putting off the German)

GRAYISALEGEND wrote:I thought he was rubbish

what with a 90 average? played a lot darts have you !

and Dave Ckark was a digrace. He has no bottle and just sat grinning when "interviewing" Colin. He should have challenged him more.

what got me was Lloyd's reaction to the crowd booing him at the end - what the hell did he expect! He should have been much more gracious to the crowd because what he did was out of order. He should get punished but not disqualified. Seems to me that you need a system like tennis, i.e. the ref shoul...

TheBlizzard wrote:I don't have any opinions on them mate. I started the thread so I can find out

oh.
I'll look forward to your contributions on the forum then!

give us your opinions on the above. Thats the usual way to start a discussion

I see Ted is cultivating the 'double bag' look.

sacked probably because of his Kellett comment. You simply can't a/ say that and b/ not know in the first place who he is.
I thought at the time that that should be that.

nope, just a few seedings different does not do it for me. Prefer the current version where I would get Burnett playing and not Thornton (in my imaginary competition further up). Unless of course you don't want to reward the current years best floor players with TV places?

hmm, thats not a great sell to be honest, especially not vs the hassle of changing it.

Bradders, you have still not really said WHY you want a 1 yr list. If its about the criteria for qualifying for TV tounaments then see my posts, the current system is better.

But everyone is ignoring the point I made above that the current system does reward the hot streaks better!!! By going to a 1 yr OOM you obviously would just pick from that list for majors (and not from the 1 yr Pro tour as well because it would be a nonsense to pick form 2 one yr lists) so would no...

I hate to say it but I said last year that this event (on TV) was on borrowed time. There is no way ITV would have been happy last year not getting 3 of the 4 finalists from the Wold Championships held a few weeks before (Whitlock, Barney and Webster). Its just a crazy situation for a TV major. Now ...