Page 56 of 58

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 10:10 pm
by chrismason
phil davies wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 6:14 pm
chrismason wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 6:12 pm
phil davies wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 6:09 pm
chrismason wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 5:17 pm
nikkiboy wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 10:40 am
I did have a wee chuckle at Chris Mason's tweet saying that everyone should be verified, especially when he told us a few wees ago that everyone on Twitter and Facebook WERE verified :grin:

Comments saying that that user should be reported to the police, what do people here think?
I think you will find I said if they were verified they would be accountable for their actions online, thus less likely to post some of the shit like we see above, why do you think people use a alias to post behind Nikkiboy?
Indeed now then Chris who pmd you. Or are you going to continue to be a hypocrite and allow them to stay anonymous?
Not anonymous to me, hope that helps, thanks Chris
So you continue to be a hypocrite then thanks for that. Also I dont use an alias but their we go for some reason it’s one rule for them and another for the rest of us.

Have a good day.
Everyday is a good day, maybe you should move out your mums box room and get yourself a bird pal, and by fek you are really are illiterate for someone who claims to be so well educated! No hypocrisy here pal the person who sent me a picture isn't anonymous, I know the fella, you see the difference brains?

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 1:20 am
by phil davies
chrismason wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 10:10 pm
phil davies wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 6:14 pm
chrismason wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 6:12 pm
phil davies wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 6:09 pm
chrismason wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 5:17 pm


I think you will find I said if they were verified they would be accountable for their actions online, thus less likely to post some of the shit like we see above, why do you think people use a alias to post behind Nikkiboy?
Indeed now then Chris who pmd you. Or are you going to continue to be a hypocrite and allow them to stay anonymous?
Not anonymous to me, hope that helps, thanks Chris
So you continue to be a hypocrite then thanks for that. Also I dont use an alias but their we go for some reason it’s one rule for them and another for the rest of us.

Have a good day.
Everyday is a good day, maybe you should move out your mums box room and get yourself a bird pal, and by fek you are really are illiterate for someone who claims to be so well educated! No hypocrisy here pal the person who sent me a picture isn't anonymous, I know the fella, you see the difference brains?
More assumptions and hypocrisy.

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 8:00 am
by DavidOwen67
Here we go again....

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 8:02 am
by BlueSpark
Is this about hypocrisy, I wasn’t sure.

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 9:23 am
by Ginge

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 9:30 am
by Pompey Col
phil davies wrote:
Thu May 16, 2019 1:20 am
chrismason wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 10:10 pm
phil davies wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 6:14 pm
chrismason wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 6:12 pm
phil davies wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 6:09 pm


Indeed now then Chris who pmd you. Or are you going to continue to be a hypocrite and allow them to stay anonymous?
Not anonymous to me, hope that helps, thanks Chris
So you continue to be a hypocrite then thanks for that. Also I dont use an alias but their we go for some reason it’s one rule for them and another for the rest of us.

Have a good day.
Everyday is a good day, maybe you should move out your mums box room and get yourself a bird pal, and by fek you are really are illiterate for someone who claims to be so well educated! No hypocrisy here pal the person who sent me a picture isn't anonymous, I know the fella, you see the difference brains?
More assumptions and hypocrisy.

Phil,why the hate towards Chris? He is ???winning??? his battle with Mental Health issues,and should be admired for leaving his criminal “”””past”””behind him.

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 11:01 am
by nikkiboy
chrismason wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 5:17 pm
nikkiboy wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 10:40 am
I did have a wee chuckle at Chris Mason's tweet saying that everyone should be verified, especially when he told us a few wees ago that everyone on Twitter and Facebook WERE verified :grin:

Comments saying that that user should be reported to the police, what do people here think?
I think you will find I said if they were verified they would be accountable for their actions online, thus less likely to post some of the shit like we see above, why do you think people use a alias to post behind Nikkiboy?
People use an alias for many reasons Chris, mostly because most forums have always used usernames rather than real names and it just kind of stuck, twitter is exactly the same. I was a member on BDO forums when they decided that using real names would be the way forward, I changed my username to my real name as did others and within a month the site effectively closed down due to no-one using it.

I think you believe that people don't use their real names for nefarious reasons, believing that they can get away with whatever they like under the comfort blanket of assumed anonymity, there is no such thing because just like Facebook and Twitter the forum sign up process involves that you verify your email address but unlike Facebook and Twitter this site automatically bars email addresses from anonymous email sites so is actually more secure and has a higher degree of tracability.

Of course there will always be the JCs of this world who think they are anonymous and spout all sorts of abuse at others but if you took a moment to check you would see that it is not spouted or allowed on here, all of his abuse is via his blog which is hosted by Google but I will bet that the moaners still use Google every single day still even though they are the ones who are publishing all his bile against them, indeed Larry Page is still awaiting his first visit from a BDO board member. The people who knock this forum should take a moment to digest that although I doubt most have the nouse to comprehend what it actually means.

The real name thing is a distraction that some people get hung up on, a hate or sexual crime is committed every 30 minutes on Facebook by people who use their real names, similarly on Twitter. Some use usernames because they have positions in organisations and provide the odd snippet of info that their bosses may frown upon. Most of us on here know who each other are and don't hide our real names, why would we? Varification on all forms of social media is not only impossible to police but could be easily circumvented by those wishing to hide their identity and abuse others, moreover in the world you are advocating people would be more vulnerable to abuse due to their false belief that everyone was verified and therefore they were more safe. A bit like when the emails claiming to be from your bank started arriving and people clicked the link and lost thousands because after all their bank was verified, wasn't it?

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 2:15 pm
by ssjsa
I wonder who it will be ;-)


Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 2:33 pm
by Buzz Fledderjohn
ssjsa wrote:
Thu May 16, 2019 2:15 pm
I wonder who it will be ;-)

I assume from the winking face you already know who it is?

I haven't got a clue, but would guess it's Durrant from his comments in his GSOD interview on the other thread.

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 2:36 pm
by Ginge
The tension is absolutely non-existent.

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 2:51 pm
by JOEY
Hope it's Barney coming back and could kickstart a revival? Then he could shelv them retirement plans for a few years 🙂

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 3:00 pm
by Ginge
Yes, because changing darts has kick started many a career. Bunting, Wright.....

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 3:04 pm
by Moongoose McQueeen
Callan Rydz

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 3:41 pm
by ssjsa
Moongoose McQueeen wrote:
Thu May 16, 2019 3:04 pm
Callan Rydz
Correct.

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 3:42 pm
by Ginge
Giddy giddy giddy!!!!!!!

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 3:43 pm
by ssjsa
Buzz Fledderjohn wrote:
Thu May 16, 2019 2:33 pm
ssjsa wrote:
Thu May 16, 2019 2:15 pm
I wonder who it will be ;-)

I assume from the winking face you already know who it is?

I haven't got a clue, but would guess it's Durrant from his comments in his GSOD interview on the other thread.
I didn't know who it was, but in all honesty, exactly like you, I did think it might be Duzza based on the interview you referred to.

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 4:20 pm
by BlueSpark
Ginge wrote:
Thu May 16, 2019 2:36 pm
The tension is absolutely non-existent.
:grin:

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 5:25 pm
by JOEY
Ahh damn

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Sat Jun 01, 2019 6:32 pm
by ssjsa

Re: Social Media Watch

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2019 8:03 pm
by ssjsa