Moongoose McQueeen wrote:A juicy topic on real fanatics today.
Have to ask, why is it a closed group that you cannot read unless you join?
Its Routs page so you will have to ask him!... oh hang on...
Don't use Facebook anymore so can't read it unless I sign up, seems a bit draconian to me, I mean why do that? To comment yes but just to read, that's exactly what the other fanatics did and this one was supposed to be set up to be more open and transparent.
10,300 members don't seem to mind and nice to see a few players commenting , also a few players who ask and get advice on the tour re bookings etc .
It's not Routs page and all our admin are members on here.
Then why have it as a closed group so that people not on freakbook can also read?
You can read here without signing up and signing in.
The point was that when this was set up we were told it was an alternative to the other fanatics who were censoring the content and only letting people they know and like join - hello real fanatics is now just the same isn't it?
Because Whinge thinks that because sparky is in his pocket he can say anything he wants.
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
nikkiboy wrote:
Have to ask, why is it a closed group that you cannot read unless you join?
Its Routs page so you will have to ask him!... oh hang on...
Don't use Facebook anymore so can't read it unless I sign up, seems a bit draconian to me, I mean why do that? To comment yes but just to read, that's exactly what the other fanatics did and this one was supposed to be set up to be more open and transparent.
10,300 members don't seem to mind and nice to see a few players commenting , also a few players who ask and get advice on the tour re bookings etc .
It's not Routs page and all our admin are members on here.
Then why have it as a closed group so that people not on freakbook can also read?
You can read here without signing up and signing in.
The point was that when this was set up we were told it was an alternative to the other fanatics who were censoring the content and only letting people they know and like join - hello real fanatics is now just the same isn't it?
Surely not too much to ask to join a Facebook group to comment and read about Real Fanatics .
Skewball wrote:
Its Routs page so you will have to ask him!... oh hang on...
Don't use Facebook anymore so can't read it unless I sign up, seems a bit draconian to me, I mean why do that? To comment yes but just to read, that's exactly what the other fanatics did and this one was supposed to be set up to be more open and transparent.
10,300 members don't seem to mind and nice to see a few players commenting , also a few players who ask and get advice on the tour re bookings etc .
It's not Routs page and all our admin are members on here.
Then why have it as a closed group so that people not on freakbook can also read?
You can read here without signing up and signing in.
The point was that when this was set up we were told it was an alternative to the other fanatics who were censoring the content and only letting people they know and like join - hello real fanatics is now just the same isn't it?
Surely not too much to ask to join a Facebook group to comment and read about Real Fanatics .
What do you do if you are not on or don't use Facebook Paul?
Conversely surely it's not too much to ask that the group be made open and not closed so that anyone could read it?
Maybe the illegal stream is someone with a phone in the front row. FreeSport are doing well, their wrestling on Thursday had less than 1000 rattling around in the Echo Arena.
Re the poll above re C4 pulling out of lakeside. Interesting article in the paper this week re bt sport.
It was saying how they lost 5,000 viewers and that they may not pursue football coverage at any cost. That they have a plan b if they lose Pl footie.
The main point of the article (financial section) was that maybe bt need to realise they are a communication company and thus need to invest more in the Internet cables etc and not a sports and entertainment channel.
now if bt cut back on sport including lakeside would that have an impact on C4? Are costs shared thus costs would double for C4?
devosteve wrote:Not sure if this the best thread but.....
Re the poll above re C4 pulling out of lakeside. Interesting article in the paper this week re bt sport.
It was saying how they lost 5,000 viewers and that they may not pursue football coverage at any cost. That they have a plan b if they lose Pl footie.
The main point of the article (financial section) was that maybe bt need to realise they are a communication company and thus need to invest more in the Internet cables etc and not a sports and entertainment channel.
now if bt cut back on sport including lakeside would that have an impact on C4? Are costs shared thus costs would double for C4?
BT Sport as a standalone entity runs at a loss, the rest of the business allows it to bid for PL football and the like.
As for how the costs between C4 and BT Sport are split: no idea. Cant be 50:50 in my opnion as Channel 4 seem to get the better sessions.
nikkiboy wrote:
Don't use Facebook anymore so can't read it unless I sign up, seems a bit draconian to me, I mean why do that? To comment yes but just to read, that's exactly what the other fanatics did and this one was supposed to be set up to be more open and transparent.
10,300 members don't seem to mind and nice to see a few players commenting , also a few players who ask and get advice on the tour re bookings etc .
It's not Routs page and all our admin are members on here.
Then why have it as a closed group so that people not on freakbook can also read?
You can read here without signing up and signing in.
The point was that when this was set up we were told it was an alternative to the other fanatics who were censoring the content and only letting people they know and like join - hello real fanatics is now just the same isn't it?
Surely not too much to ask to join a Facebook group to comment and read about Real Fanatics .
What do you do if you are not on or don't use Facebook Paul?
Conversely surely it's not too much to ask that the group be made open and not closed so that anyone could read it?
If it was an open group and you looked at it you would be using facebook
WCDPA wrote:
10,300 members don't seem to mind and nice to see a few players commenting , also a few players who ask and get advice on the tour re bookings etc .
It's not Routs page and all our admin are members on here.
Then why have it as a closed group so that people not on freakbook can also read?
You can read here without signing up and signing in.
The point was that when this was set up we were told it was an alternative to the other fanatics who were censoring the content and only letting people they know and like join - hello real fanatics is now just the same isn't it?
Surely not too much to ask to join a Facebook group to comment and read about Real Fanatics .
What do you do if you are not on or don't use Facebook Paul?
Conversely surely it's not too much to ask that the group be made open and not closed so that anyone could read it?
If it was an open group and you looked at it you would be using facebook
Indeed but in the same way you read any blog, newspaper or forum i.e. without having to sign up and be approved by admin.
