WCDPA wrote:
12different players hit 100 aves is that the most ever ? Sort of bears out that top say 16 in PDC are the difference between the codes
Yes you are right Cross did struggle there....el_ringo wrote:WCDPA wrote:
12different players hit 100 aves is that the most ever ? Sort of bears out that top say 16 in PDC are the difference between the codes
One of those was a prelim player (lewis) at Lakeside a prelim player is lucky to hit the board let alone a 100+ average
Shouldn't count anyway as he was knocked out in the qualifier........el_ringo wrote:WCDPA wrote:
12different players hit 100 aves is that the most ever ? Sort of bears out that top say 16 in PDC are the difference between the codes
One of those was a prelim player (lewis) at Lakeside a prelim player is lucky to hit the board let alone a 100+ average
Phil's parting giftGinge wrote:Well the final "final" figure is in for UK viewing figures.
Sky Sports Main Event = 706k
Sky Sports Arena/Darts = 352k
TOTAL = 1.058m
Blimey, over a million for the first time in ages.
But that doesnt mean it didnt happen, everyone has seen the damming footage. So it was a failed attempt at gamesmanship, must cough louder next time,,Paddy McGinty wrote:I have seen the text from Bernie Smith saying that he heard nothing.
It's difficult, one of two things happened here and you and I are not in a position to know what actually occurred.Canuck_bully wrote:But that doesnt mean it didnt happen, everyone has seen the damming footage. So it was a failed attempt at gamesmanship, must cough louder next time,,Paddy McGinty wrote:I have seen the text from Bernie Smith saying that he heard nothing.
I think the lesson to all players is that blatant gamesmanship will not be tolerated, silly to attempt it with Sky cameras all over the place.
So. This will be me saying it isn't possible to do a draw like seed one v seed 32. Except that I said the opposite. Ho hum.Murphio wrote:If the draw was made in advance like 'seed one v seed 32' couldn't that potentially throw up huge integrity questions over the event still to be played? If you know that, for example, a win in a certain round guarantees you face a certain player you would rather avoid.... what then? It may be possible to do the draw in such a way but why not wait until the qualification criteria is fully established? Of course we are only having this conversation because, yet again, Paddy and IFM are trying to correlate the situation with the BDO. I haven't previously commented on the Lakeside draw as I couldn't care less. But to compare the two when the field and settings for one isnt fully complete yet is beyond hilarious.
Murphio wrote:So. This will be me saying it isn't possible to do a draw like seed one v seed 32. Except that I said the opposite. Ho hum.Murphio wrote:If the draw was made in advance like 'seed one v seed 32' couldn't that potentially throw up huge integrity questions over the event still to be played? If you know that, for example, a win in a certain round guarantees you face a certain player you would rather avoid.... what then? It may be possible to do the draw in such a way but why not wait until the qualification criteria is fully established? Of course we are only having this conversation because, yet again, Paddy and IFM are trying to correlate the situation with the BDO. I haven't previously commented on the Lakeside draw as I couldn't care less. But to compare the two when the field and settings for one isnt fully complete yet is beyond hilarious.
Hello Garry, how was "work"?Garry Murphy wrote:Murphio wrote:So. This will be me saying it isn't possible to do a draw like seed one v seed 32. Except that I said the opposite. Ho hum.Murphio wrote:If the draw was made in advance like 'seed one v seed 32' couldn't that potentially throw up huge integrity questions over the event still to be played? If you know that, for example, a win in a certain round guarantees you face a certain player you would rather avoid.... what then? It may be possible to do the draw in such a way but why not wait until the qualification criteria is fully established? Of course we are only having this conversation because, yet again, Paddy and IFM are trying to correlate the situation with the BDO. I haven't previously commented on the Lakeside draw as I couldn't care less. But to compare the two when the field and settings for one isnt fully complete yet is beyond hilarious.
why let the truth get in the way of ifm lying ?
You approved his post.BlueSpark wrote:Here we go again....
The "work" you refer to that I get paid for, is not classed as "work" to me, when it is something I would do for free without hesitation.ifm wrote:Hello Garry, how was "work"?Garry Murphy wrote:Murphio wrote:So. This will be me saying it isn't possible to do a draw like seed one v seed 32. Except that I said the opposite. Ho hum.Murphio wrote:If the draw was made in advance like 'seed one v seed 32' couldn't that potentially throw up huge integrity questions over the event still to be played? If you know that, for example, a win in a certain round guarantees you face a certain player you would rather avoid.... what then? It may be possible to do the draw in such a way but why not wait until the qualification criteria is fully established? Of course we are only having this conversation because, yet again, Paddy and IFM are trying to correlate the situation with the BDO. I haven't previously commented on the Lakeside draw as I couldn't care less. But to compare the two when the field and settings for one isnt fully complete yet is beyond hilarious.
why let the truth get in the way of ifm lying ?
All i said was a draw could be made without knowing the participants.Garry Murphy wrote:The "work" you refer to that I get paid for, is not classed as "work" to me, when it is something I would do for free without hesitation.ifm wrote:Hello Garry, how was "work"?Garry Murphy wrote:Murphio wrote:So. This will be me saying it isn't possible to do a draw like seed one v seed 32. Except that I said the opposite. Ho hum.Murphio wrote:If the draw was made in advance like 'seed one v seed 32' couldn't that potentially throw up huge integrity questions over the event still to be played? If you know that, for example, a win in a certain round guarantees you face a certain player you would rather avoid.... what then? It may be possible to do the draw in such a way but why not wait until the qualification criteria is fully established? Of course we are only having this conversation because, yet again, Paddy and IFM are trying to correlate the situation with the BDO. I haven't previously commented on the Lakeside draw as I couldn't care less. But to compare the two when the field and settings for one isnt fully complete yet is beyond hilarious.
why let the truth get in the way of ifm lying ?
Of course you have no idea what I mean, but I am sure as always it wont get in the way of you getting things wrong yet again.
**placeholder for you to name call, or claim victory, or suggest i was forum slapped etc "
