Re: PDC Order of Merit
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2019 8:54 pm
The current PDC Order of Merit only came into being following the WC of 2007.Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2019 7:45 pmHe was the 14th seed for the 2005 PDC World Championship.DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 12:08 amBut, but, but Sexy Steve won a Lakeside World Pro. Sure he must have been above 18th in the PDC in the last 20 years?
ssjsa wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2019 8:55 pmThe current PDC Order of Merit only came into being following the WC of 2007.Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2019 7:45 pmHe was the 14th seed for the 2005 PDC World Championship.DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 12:08 amBut, but, but Sexy Steve won a Lakeside World Pro. Sure he must have been above 18th in the PDC in the last 20 years?
Was looking at this the other day.
Ian White only 104th. Can we just go back to that time pleaseChrisW wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:18 amWas looking at this the other day.
2010 order of merit.
https://www.darts1.de/ranglisten/PDC-Or ... t-2010.php
MVG just starting to infiltrate the top32
Robson reacting to that post, but not the "Thanks, Robson" post, which would have been far more confusing if it wasn't he, there.Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:58 am I beg your pardon.
The poster said that Beaton had not been ranked above 18th in the last 20 years. So if you judge that on the PDC OOM, he was wrong to say 20 years. He should have said 10 years when the OOM was introduced.
Beaton was seeded above 18 before the OOM came into being. So he was wrong regardless.
Good morning learned colleague.DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:36 amRobson reacting to that post, but not the "Thanks, Robson" post, which would have been far more confusing if it wasn't he, there.Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:58 am I beg your pardon.
The poster said that Beaton had not been ranked above 18th in the last 20 years. So if you judge that on the PDC OOM, he was wrong to say 20 years. He should have said 10 years when the OOM was introduced.
Beaton was seeded above 18 before the OOM came into being. So he was wrong regardless.
You too, Mr Admin. Have a buzzer of a day.Admin wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:40 amGood morning learned colleague.DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:36 amRobson reacting to that post, but not the "Thanks, Robson" post, which would have been far more confusing if it wasn't he, there.Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:58 am I beg your pardon.
The poster said that Beaton had not been ranked above 18th in the last 20 years. So if you judge that on the PDC OOM, he was wrong to say 20 years. He should have said 10 years when the OOM was introduced.
Beaton was seeded above 18 before the OOM came into being. So he was wrong regardless.
Unfortunately, the quoted account can no longer respond.
Have a lovely day.
Admin wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:40 amGood morning learned colleague.DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:36 amRobson reacting to that post, but not the "Thanks, Robson" post, which would have been far more confusing if it wasn't he, there.Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:58 am I beg your pardon.
The poster said that Beaton had not been ranked above 18th in the last 20 years. So if you judge that on the PDC OOM, he was wrong to say 20 years. He should have said 10 years when the OOM was introduced.
Beaton was seeded above 18 before the OOM came into being. So he was wrong regardless.
Unfortunately, the quoted account can no longer respond.
Have a lovely day.
Because it annoys people like youILAD wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:44 pmAdmin wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:40 amGood morning learned colleague.DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:36 amRobson reacting to that post, but not the "Thanks, Robson" post, which would have been far more confusing if it wasn't he, there.Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:58 am I beg your pardon.
The poster said that Beaton had not been ranked above 18th in the last 20 years. So if you judge that on the PDC OOM, he was wrong to say 20 years. He should have said 10 years when the OOM was introduced.
Beaton was seeded above 18 before the OOM came into being. So he was wrong regardless.
Unfortunately, the quoted account can no longer respond.
Have a lovely day.
Why use this account? Why hide behind Admin? Just have the balls to ban using your own account. Rather odd.
As I say no balls. And it doesn’t annoy me, just makes the mods look weak, bluespark?Admin wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:18 pmBecause it annoys people like youILAD wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:44 pmAdmin wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:40 amGood morning learned colleague.DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:36 amRobson reacting to that post, but not the "Thanks, Robson" post, which would have been far more confusing if it wasn't he, there.Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:58 am I beg your pardon.
The poster said that Beaton had not been ranked above 18th in the last 20 years. So if you judge that on the PDC OOM, he was wrong to say 20 years. He should have said 10 years when the OOM was introduced.
Beaton was seeded above 18 before the OOM came into being. So he was wrong regardless.
Unfortunately, the quoted account can no longer respond.
Have a lovely day.
Why use this account? Why hide behind Admin? Just have the balls to ban using your own account. Rather odd.