BlueSpark wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2019 8:50 pm

DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2019 8:50 pm

Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2019 7:45 pm
He was the 14th seed for the 2005 PDC World Championship.

Thanks, Robson.

Indeed

Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2019 7:45 pm

DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 12:08 am

ssjsa wrote: ↑Mon May 27, 2019 9:11 pm

But, but, but Sexy Steve won a Lakeside World Pro. Sure he must have been above 18th in the PDC in the last 20 years?

He was the 14th seed for the 2005 PDC World Championship.

ssjsa wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2019 8:55 pm

Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2019 7:45 pm

DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 12:08 am

ssjsa wrote: ↑Mon May 27, 2019 9:11 pm

But, but, but Sexy Steve won a Lakeside World Pro. Sure he must have been above 18th in the PDC in the last 20 years?

He was the 14th seed for the 2005 PDC World Championship.

The current PDC Order of Merit only came into being following the WC of 2007.

Dannyboy wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:13 am You can see the impact that more money lower down is having on the rankings. Just a few years ago, less than £100k in ranking events would get you into the top 32. Now it’ll barely get you into the top 50.

ChrisW wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:18 am

Dannyboy wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:13 am You can see the impact that more money lower down is having on the rankings. Just a few years ago, less than £100k in ranking events would get you into the top 32. Now it’ll barely get you into the top 50.

Was looking at this the other day.
2010 order of merit.
https://www.darts1.de/ranglisten/PDC-Or ... t-2010.php
MVG just starting to infiltrate the top32

Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:58 am I beg your pardon.

The poster said that Beaton had not been ranked above 18th in the last 20 years. So if you judge that on the PDC OOM, he was wrong to say 20 years. He should have said 10 years when the OOM was introduced.

Beaton was seeded above 18 before the OOM came into being. So he was wrong regardless.

DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:36 am

Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:58 am I beg your pardon.

The poster said that Beaton had not been ranked above 18th in the last 20 years. So if you judge that on the PDC OOM, he was wrong to say 20 years. He should have said 10 years when the OOM was introduced.

Beaton was seeded above 18 before the OOM came into being. So he was wrong regardless.

Robson reacting to that post, but not the "Thanks, Robson" post, which would have been far more confusing if it wasn't he, there.

Admin wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:40 am

DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:36 am

Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:58 am I beg your pardon.

The poster said that Beaton had not been ranked above 18th in the last 20 years. So if you judge that on the PDC OOM, he was wrong to say 20 years. He should have said 10 years when the OOM was introduced.

Beaton was seeded above 18 before the OOM came into being. So he was wrong regardless.

Robson reacting to that post, but not the "Thanks, Robson" post, which would have been far more confusing if it wasn't he, there.

Good morning learned colleague.
Unfortunately, the quoted account can no longer respond.
Have a lovely day.

Admin wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:40 am

DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:36 am

Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:58 am I beg your pardon.

The poster said that Beaton had not been ranked above 18th in the last 20 years. So if you judge that on the PDC OOM, he was wrong to say 20 years. He should have said 10 years when the OOM was introduced.

Beaton was seeded above 18 before the OOM came into being. So he was wrong regardless.

Robson reacting to that post, but not the "Thanks, Robson" post, which would have been far more confusing if it wasn't he, there.

Good morning learned colleague.
Unfortunately, the quoted account can no longer respond.
Have a lovely day.

ILAD wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:44 pm

Admin wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:40 am

DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:36 am

Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:58 am I beg your pardon.

The poster said that Beaton had not been ranked above 18th in the last 20 years. So if you judge that on the PDC OOM, he was wrong to say 20 years. He should have said 10 years when the OOM was introduced.

Beaton was seeded above 18 before the OOM came into being. So he was wrong regardless.

Robson reacting to that post, but not the "Thanks, Robson" post, which would have been far more confusing if it wasn't he, there.

Good morning learned colleague.
Unfortunately, the quoted account can no longer respond.
Have a lovely day.

Why use this account? Why hide behind Admin? Just have the balls to ban using your own account. Rather odd.

Admin wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:18 pm

ILAD wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:44 pm

Admin wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:40 am

DavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:36 am

Goldeneye wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:58 am I beg your pardon.

The poster said that Beaton had not been ranked above 18th in the last 20 years. So if you judge that on the PDC OOM, he was wrong to say 20 years. He should have said 10 years when the OOM was introduced.

Beaton was seeded above 18 before the OOM came into being. So he was wrong regardless.

Robson reacting to that post, but not the "Thanks, Robson" post, which would have been far more confusing if it wasn't he, there.

Good morning learned colleague.
Unfortunately, the quoted account can no longer respond.
Have a lovely day.

Why use this account? Why hide behind Admin? Just have the balls to ban using your own account. Rather odd.

Because it annoys people like you

ChrisW wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 5:40 pm So it annoys you that you don't know who is using the log in.

ILAD wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 8:59 pm

ChrisW wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 5:40 pm So it annoys you that you don't know who is using the log in.

I’m sure someone will let the cat out of the bag, probably the forum rat, do you know him?