ChrisW wrote:I have consulted a PhD in Statistics. He said both made no difference to the outcome of either tournament. Q.E.D.
What are the odds?
Of what, Chris taking the side of Ian and Rout? About 1.01.
Ian, that's 1/100 in fractional odds before you ask.
No I am taking the side of who gives a feck.
Supported by 99% of the forum.
Take it up with whoever started the thread.
If they don't like a definitive answer, how does this affect your life?
But still I am taking the 'not bovered' stance.
I hope your PhD friend has not wasted his time.
As It will not have any effect in either of the tournament's results.
Of what, Chris taking the side of Ian and Rout? About 1.01.
Ian, that's 1/100 in fractional odds before you ask.
No I am taking the side of who gives a feck.
Supported by 99% of the forum.
Take it up with whoever started the thread.
If they don't like a definitive answer, how does this affect your life?
But still I am taking the 'not bovered' stance.
I hope your PhD friend has not wasted his time.
As It will not have any effect in either of the tournament's results.
It doesn't change a thing. But our diminutive friend thought the odds were 3 million to one and now he's really hurting
Of what, Chris taking the side of Ian and Rout? About 1.01.
Ian, that's 1/100 in fractional odds before you ask.
No I am taking the side of who gives a feck.
Supported by 99% of the forum.
Take it up with whoever started the thread.
If they don't like a definitive answer, how does this affect your life?
But still I am taking the 'not bovered' stance.
I hope your PhD friend has not wasted his time.
As It will not have any effect in either of the tournament's results.
You are the ultimate hanger on. Too high of an opinion of himself to hang about with the loser kids so mills around the middle of the road guys pretending to fit in by agreeing with everything they say. But when it comes down to it you really belong with the losers. And you know it.
ChrisW wrote:I have consulted a PhD in Statistics. He said both made no difference to the outcome of either tournament. Q.E.D.
What are the odds?
Of what, Chris taking the side of Ian and Rout? About 1.01.
Ian, that's 1/100 in fractional odds before you ask.
No I am taking the side of who gives a feck.
Supported by 99% of the forum.
33% think Whinge is a nob so I disagree with your maths there, maybe we should invent another professor to check your results
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
May I just point out that the 3 million to 1 odds came from one of the fanboys not Rout, you're welcome
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
BlueSpark wrote:Morning everyone.
So 1 in 576 was where we left off yesterday wasn't it?
Such a disappointing end to the thread. It started off with odds in the millions, hints of draw rigging and certain players having pre knowledge of who they would draw. Now we are down to this? This maths expert has ruined this with his facts.
ifm wrote:May I just point out that the 3 million to 1 odds came from one of the fanboys not Rout, you're welcome
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Yes. But he leapt on those figures like a 20 dollar hooker on an oil tycoon.
So you accept the reasoning and working of the recursive iteration he sent me because we've now factored for dependency, yes?
It was a nice try I'll give you 7/10
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
BlueSpark wrote:Morning everyone.
So 1 in 576 was where we left off yesterday wasn't it?
Such a disappointing end to the thread. It started off with odds in the millions, hints of draw rigging and certain players having pre knowledge of who they would draw. Now we are down to this? This maths expert has ruined this with his facts.
Moongoose McQueeen wrote:Who said what regarding the odds?
Who said the odds would be massive?
ifm wrote:
Well, certainly longer odds than the womens number one seed in the bdo, in fact longer than the Turkish open which the fanboys said was obvious cheating, why do you ask?
