Ginge wrote:So basic that Ian explained it all on page 1 of this thread...oh....
Honest answers Whinge, did you Google it and what was the answer?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Ill go off the word of a maths professor if that's alright?
So you refuse to answer, I'll be honest and say I didn't expect you to deflect that.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
And on it continues. Could be a long one.
Had more than a few beers tonight, Tsingtao as it happens. Lovely.
12 days at work on the trot and it's time for sleep.
Look forward to catching up in the morning.
TTFN
BlueSpark wrote:And on it continues. Could be a long one.
Had more than a few beers tonight, Tsingtao as it happens. Lovely.
12 days at work on the trot and it's time for sleep.
Look forward to catching up in the morning.
TTFN
Rout wrote:When it suits this place is full of maths and stats experts. Suddenly not one on the whole forum and some guy David Owen knows is Sir Isaac Newton.
Who pressed the fanboy panic button this time?
I think it's hilarious the lengths they have gone to to get the odds down, it started at 3 million to 1, then drupid was lauded as the maths expert but gave 3 different answers all less than the previous, then as his credibility was shot we have a "friend" who is some genius apparently to lower the odds even more, you couldn't make it up, or could you?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Give it a week and it'll be odds on
What makes me laugh is that if you Google it (and I'm certain they all have) it clearly tells you that it's the odds of each draw multiplied, so 71 x 127 x 127, really, really basic maths but because it's the pdc they are trying to hoodwink everyone
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Oh dear. There's a factor called dependency.
There are new players in the weekend draws that you can't have played on the Friday.
Also, the fact that you don't understand complex probability problems doesn't mean you can try and trump it with a simpler model.
Take your medicine like a big boy then explain the recursive iteration to me.
BlueSpark wrote:And on it continues. Could be a long one.
Had more than a few beers tonight, Tsingtao as it happens. Lovely.
12 days at work on the trot and it's time for sleep.
Look forward to catching up in the morning.
TTFN
BlueSpark wrote:And on it continues. Could be a long one.
Had more than a few beers tonight, Tsingtao as it happens. Lovely.
12 days at work on the trot and it's time for sleep.
Look forward to catching up in the morning.
TTFN
Google says differently, I'll be honest and admit I believe Google
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
ChrisW wrote:I have consulted a PhD in Statistics. He said both made no difference to the outcome of either tournament. Q.E.D.
I'm sure drupid will invent another "friend" to refute that by 600 %
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
