Question for the statisticians

Heard a rumour? - Post it here
Deleted User

Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Deleted User »

Moongoose McQueeen wrote:What happened to the millions to one odds????
The ravings of a clown.
User avatar
Rout
International
Posts: 15626
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:19 am

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Rout »

They must have agreed that figure in the meeting. Nice touch to include the picture of the workings out.
"Deserved Better"

GM, 2021.
Deleted User

Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Deleted User »

Rout wrote:They must have agreed that figure in the meeting. Nice touch to include the picture of the workings out.
It was sent over. Lives in an OL postcode, but not a shithole one like Rochdale.

Also, like you can understand the iteration anyway.
User avatar
Rout
International
Posts: 15626
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:19 am

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Rout »

DavidOwen67 wrote:
Rout wrote:They must have agreed that figure in the meeting. Nice touch to include the picture of the workings out.
It was sent over. Lives in an OL postcode, but not a shithole one like Rochdale.

Also, like you can understand the iteration anyway.
Thanks for the postcode update.
"Deserved Better"

GM, 2021.
Deleted User

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Deleted User »

Rout wrote:
DavidOwen67 wrote:
Rout wrote:They must have agreed that figure in the meeting. Nice touch to include the picture of the workings out.
It was sent over. Lives in an OL postcode, but not a shithole one like Rochdale.

Also, like you can understand the iteration anyway.
Thanks for the postcode update.
^^^^ Seething.
User avatar
Rout
International
Posts: 15626
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:19 am

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Rout »

Yes, I bet whoever lives in an OL postcode is very annoyed.
"Deserved Better"

GM, 2021.
User avatar
BlueSpark
International
Posts: 14631
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:22 pm

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by BlueSpark »

1 in 576 :grin:
Deleted User

Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Deleted User »

Rout wrote:Yes, I bet whoever lives in an OL postcode is very annoyed.
Not in Uppermill, old chap. :D
User avatar
BlueSpark
International
Posts: 14631
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:22 pm

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by BlueSpark »

Rout wrote:Some wonderful deflection tactics being used by Ginge here.

1 in 3 million hey. Let's focus on the discussion at hand. 1 in 3 million.
How did this go?
Deleted User

Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Deleted User »

BlueSpark wrote:
Rout wrote:Some wonderful deflection tactics being used by Ginge here.

1 in 3 million hey. Let's focus on the discussion at hand. 1 in 3 million.
How did this go?
Exactly. Why do you think Rout us in full deflection mode?
Deleted User

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Deleted User »

1 in 3 million are the odds of naming 2 players in advance of the weekend and THEN them drawing each other 3 times.

Hardly the odds of ANY 2 players being paired up 3 times.
User avatar
BlueSpark
International
Posts: 14631
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:22 pm

Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by BlueSpark »

DavidOwen67 wrote:
BlueSpark wrote:
Rout wrote:Some wonderful deflection tactics being used by Ginge here.

1 in 3 million hey. Let's focus on the discussion at hand. 1 in 3 million.
How did this go?
Exactly. Why do you think Rout us in full deflection mode?
Desperate
User avatar
Rout
International
Posts: 15626
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:19 am

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Rout »

BlueSpark wrote:My bet is that nothing is apparent and Rout has everyone getting their calculators out for no reason.
How did this go for you?
"Deserved Better"

GM, 2021.
User avatar
BlueSpark
International
Posts: 14631
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:22 pm

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by BlueSpark »

Rout wrote:
BlueSpark wrote:My bet is that nothing is apparent and Rout has everyone getting their calculators out for no reason.
How did this go for you?
1 in 576.
Let's let that sink in.
Deleted User

Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Deleted User »

Rout wrote:
BlueSpark wrote:My bet is that nothing is apparent and Rout has everyone getting their calculators out for no reason.
How did this go for you?
So, still no serious comment on the fact that your call of 3 million to 1 was out by a factor of 6000?
Murphio
International
Posts: 6233
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:20 pm

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Murphio »

Well, this went well.
User avatar
BlueSpark
International
Posts: 14631
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:22 pm

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by BlueSpark »

Murphio wrote:Well, this went well.
Someone looks a bit of a wally :grin:
User avatar
ifm
International
Posts: 18604
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by ifm »

So we then multiply by 127 or are we still ignoring a draw?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"

Madsocks
User avatar
BlueSpark
International
Posts: 14631
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:22 pm

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by BlueSpark »

Ffs
Ginge
International
Posts: 69208
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:23 am
Location: The West Riding

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Ginge »

ifm wrote:So we then multiply by 127 or are we still ignoring a draw?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
HNNNNNNNGGGGGG!!!!
Big Jock Knew
Post Reply