Question for the statisticians

[Ginge]

Strange how we would take the answer given by the mathematician, or statistician if you will.
Just like the thread title suggests we should.

Yes but the person David consulted once sang Chase the Sun so his opinion is null and void.

[Murphio]

Isn't it funny how the lowest answer given was taken as fact?

It's even funnier how a mathematician's answer apparently can't be taken as fact as it wasn't the answer you wanted.

[BlueSpark]

This could not be more hysterical.

[Rout]

When it suits this place is full of maths and stats experts. Suddenly not one on the whole forum and some guy David Owen knows is Sir Isaac Newton.

Who pressed the fanboy panic button this time?

[Ginge]

When it suits this place is full of maths and stats experts. Suddenly not one on the whole forum and some guy David Owen knows is Sir Isaac Newton.

Who pressed the fanboy panic button this time?

[BlueSpark]

Deflections everywhere.
Let the evening festivities commence.

[ifm]

When it suits this place is full of maths and stats experts. Suddenly not one on the whole forum and some guy David Owen knows is Sir Isaac Newton.

Who pressed the fanboy panic button this time?

I think it's hilarious the lengths they have gone to to get the odds down, it started at 3 million to 1, then drupid was lauded as the maths expert but gave 3 different answers all less than the previous, then as his credibility was shot we have a "friend" who is some genius apparently to lower the odds even more, you couldn't make it up, or could you?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[Rout]

Deflections everywhere.

Yes. Yes there is.

[Ginge]

Going to have to check the minutes of this mornings meetings to see if anyone predicted this seething.

[Rout]

When it suits this place is full of maths and stats experts. Suddenly not one on the whole forum and some guy David Owen knows is Sir Isaac Newton.

Who pressed the fanboy panic button this time?

I think it's hilarious the lengths they have gone to to get the odds down, it started at 3 million to 1, then drupid was lauded as the maths expert but gave 3 different answers all less than the previous, then as his credibility was shot we have a "friend" who is some genius apparently to lower the odds even more, you couldn't make it up, or could you?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Give it a week and it'll be odds on

[BlueSpark]

Any definitive answer to the question posed in this thread?

BDO - Dirty cheating filthy bastards
PDC - I see nothing wrong at all

The usual blinkered fayre.

No no, as it happens we do.
1 in 576.

[ifm]

Any definitive answer to the question posed in this thread?

BDO - Dirty cheating filthy bastards
PDC - I see nothing wrong at all

The usual blinkered fayre.

No no, as it happens we do.
1 in 576.

Ahh but as you have gone with the lowest one each recalculation you might want to just hold on as I'm sure another fanboy will be along to lower it further.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[ifm]

When it suits this place is full of maths and stats experts. Suddenly not one on the whole forum and some guy David Owen knows is Sir Isaac Newton.

Who pressed the fanboy panic button this time?

I think it's hilarious the lengths they have gone to to get the odds down, it started at 3 million to 1, then drupid was lauded as the maths expert but gave 3 different answers all less than the previous, then as his credibility was shot we have a "friend" who is some genius apparently to lower the odds even more, you couldn't make it up, or could you?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Give it a week and it'll be odds on

What makes me laugh is that if you Google it (and I'm certain they all have) it clearly tells you that it's the odds of each draw multiplied, so 71 x 127 x 127, really, really basic maths but because it's the pdc they are trying to hoodwink everyone

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[Ginge]

So basic that Ian explained it all on page 1 of this thread...oh....

[ChrisW]

Rout has bagged a lot in this thread. Murphio must even respect this achievement.

[BlueSpark]

Well this just gets better.
Deflections and denial everywhere.
Even so far as the forum lapdog and sacked moderator to say Rout was just fishing with this entire thread.
Could it be any more desperate.

[ifm]

So basic that Ian explained it all on page 1 of this thread...oh....

Honest answers Whinge, did you Google it and what was the answer?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[Murphio]

This is glorious.

[Ginge]

So basic that Ian explained it all on page 1 of this thread...oh....

Honest answers Whinge, did you Google it and what was the answer?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Ill go off the word of a maths professor if that's alright?

[BlueSpark]

So basic that Ian explained it all on page 1 of this thread...oh....

Honest answers Whinge, did you Google it and what was the answer?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Ill go off the word of a maths professor if that's alright?