Question for the statisticians

Heard a rumour? - Post it here
User avatar
ifm
International
Posts: 18604
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by ifm »

Paddy McGinty wrote:Drupid has made mistakes in the past so anything he quotes as gospel should be taken with a pinch of salt........
This thread had everything, from nobody is bothered to fictitious "professors" desperately trying to change the maths to suit.
The fanboys blindly defending was classic, how many different results did they come up with in the end? 5 or 6 wasn't it? :DDD: :DDD:
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"

Madsocks
User avatar
BlueSpark
International
Posts: 14631
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:22 pm

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by BlueSpark »

ifm wrote:
Paddy McGinty wrote:Drupid has made mistakes in the past so anything he quotes as gospel should be taken with a pinch of salt........
This thread had everything, from nobody is bothered to fictitious "professors" desperately trying to change the maths to suit.
The fanboys blindly defending was classic, how many different results did they come up with in the end? 5 or 6 wasn't it? :DDD: :DDD:
1 in 576
User avatar
Paddy McGinty
International
Posts: 23512
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 11:01 am
Contact:

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Paddy McGinty »

All they have done is tried to confuse the issue by submitting a multitude of fictitious results...........they aren't fooling anyone, hypocrisy of the highest order.
"What a Fecking Catastrophe!!"
Deleted User

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Deleted User »

"Fictitious"

And he was a doctor of mathematics and not a professor.

Shocking deflection tactics.
User avatar
ifm
International
Posts: 18604
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by ifm »

A "doctor" then :-)

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"

Madsocks
User avatar
nikkiboy
International
Posts: 31008
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:34 pm

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by nikkiboy »

ifm wrote:A "doctor" then :-)

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Image
Ginge wrote:the cancer has been cut from the BDO
21st April 2016 7:01am
Deleted User

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Deleted User »

3 million to one!!!!
User avatar
ifm
International
Posts: 18604
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:18 am

Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by ifm »

DavidOwen67 wrote:3 million to one!!!!
It's changed again, any unintelligible scribble to back this up?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Last edited by ifm on Sun Aug 27, 2017 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"

Madsocks
Deleted User

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Deleted User »

ifm wrote:
DavidOwen67 wrote:3 million to one!!!!
It's changed again, and unintelligible scribble to back this up?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Whoosh, you daft sod!
User avatar
Paddy McGinty
International
Posts: 23512
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 11:01 am
Contact:

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Paddy McGinty »

As we all know the cream will always rise to the top, using the same reasoning David the shite will always sink to the bottom..........
"What a Fecking Catastrophe!!"
User avatar
ifm
International
Posts: 18604
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:18 am

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by ifm »

DavidOwen67 wrote:
ifm wrote:
DavidOwen67 wrote:3 million to one!!!!
It's changed again, and unintelligible scribble to back this up?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Whoosh, you daft sod!
Dear Lord

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"

Madsocks
User avatar
Rout
International
Posts: 15626
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:19 am

Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Rout »

ifm wrote:
Paddy McGinty wrote:Drupid has made mistakes in the past so anything he quotes as gospel should be taken with a pinch of salt........
This thread had everything, from nobody is bothered to fictitious "professors" desperately trying to change the maths to suit.
The fanboys blindly defending was classic, how many different results did they come up with in the end? 5 or 6 wasn't it? :DDD: :DDD:
I was expecting it to be entertaining when I started it. But it went much better than I expected.
"Deserved Better"

GM, 2021.
User avatar
ifm
International
Posts: 18604
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:18 am

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by ifm »

Rout wrote:
ifm wrote:
Paddy McGinty wrote:Drupid has made mistakes in the past so anything he quotes as gospel should be taken with a pinch of salt........
This thread had everything, from nobody is bothered to fictitious "professors" desperately trying to change the maths to suit.
The fanboys blindly defending was classic, how many different results did they come up with in the end? 5 or 6 wasn't it? :DDD: :DDD:
I was expecting it to be entertaining when I started it. But it went much better than I expected.
Well done mate, you got them all scrambling.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"

Madsocks
Deleted User

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Deleted User »

Wonderful.
User avatar
BlueSpark
International
Posts: 14631
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:22 pm

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by BlueSpark »

1 in 576.
Demonloy
The Ton Club
Posts: 461
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2015 6:49 pm

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Demonloy »

The odds of someone meeting the same person three times in a row are exactly the same as meeting specific different people three times in a row.........go figure!!!
User avatar
ifm
International
Posts: 18604
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:18 am

Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by ifm »

Demonloy wrote:The odds of someone meeting the same person three times in a row are exactly the same as meeting specific different people three times in a row.........go figure!!!
3 million to 1?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"

Madsocks
User avatar
Paddy McGinty
International
Posts: 23512
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 11:01 am
Contact:

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Paddy McGinty »

The software must be flawed, no other explanation possible......
"What a Fecking Catastrophe!!"
User avatar
BlueSpark
International
Posts: 14631
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:22 pm

Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by BlueSpark »

After the bumping of the Turkish open draw thread, this one my all time favourite (apart from the Deluxe one, obvs)
Enjoy.
Ginge
International
Posts: 69208
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:23 am
Location: The West Riding

Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians

Post by Ginge »

ifm wrote:
Skewball wrote:Is this an Ian meltdown I see coming?
Yes a bunch of clowns on an obscure internet forum about a niche game have the power to upset me, you must mean Whinge he's a famous flouncer ;-)
Ahem!
Big Jock Knew
Post Reply