Page 21 of 21
Re: Question for the statisticians
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:48 pm
by Ginge
Oh boy, what a read.
Re: Question for the statisticians
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:53 pm
by devosteve
BlueSpark wrote:After the bumping of the Turkish open draw thread, this one my all time favourite (apart from the Deluxe one, obvs)
Enjoy.
Can the deluxe one be bumped please. Sure I was swayed at 1st then it all began to unravel in glorious fashion
Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:56 pm
by Ginge
devosteve wrote:BlueSpark wrote:After the bumping of the Turkish open draw thread, this one my all time favourite (apart from the Deluxe one, obvs)
Enjoy.
Can the deluxe one be bumped please. Sure I was swayed at 1st then it all began to unravel in glorious fashion
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=15568
Re: Question for the statisticians
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:43 pm
by Deleted User
Ginge wrote:Oh boy, what a read.
Can't believe I'd forgotten about this. Bloody lovely read.
Rout and IFM just lost the plot completely. Any idea where they got the lunatic 3 million to 1 figure in the first place?
Trying to explain even the simplest probability calculation was like trying to explain how to programme your video to a pot plant.
Them trying to refute some rather complex, yet elegant maths was just hysterical!
Great bumping.
Re: Question for the statisticians
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:56 pm
by BlueSpark
My second favourite thread, the other one reminded me of it.
Utterly brilliant.
Re: Question for the statisticians
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:57 pm
by ChrisW
Bumpfest at the moment.
Re: Question for the statisticians
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:24 pm
by Deleted User
ChrisW wrote:Bumpfest at the moment.
Indeed. But specially selected "classics" that need a good airing every now and again.
I think this one is my favourite for so many different reasons.
Re: Question for the statisticians
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:31 pm
by Deleted User
26scored wrote:David owning everyone in this thread.
Fair play.
Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:32 pm
by Skewball
DavidOwen67 wrote:ChrisW wrote:Bumpfest at the moment.
Indeed. But specially selected "classics" that need a good airing every now and again.
I think this one is my favourite for so many different reasons.
Yes, it's definitely a favourite of mine. It's just so blatantly obvious it was fixed, across 4 different draws. When you have such ridiculas odds , beyond calculation combined with a clear and obvious motive then it's just beyond debate. It was fixed, there is no other option.
Yet people were trying to pretend it wasn't just to protect their image on here.
It was so weird.
Re: Question for the statisticians
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:39 pm
by Deleted User
Booji Boy wrote:Jeezo when you are getting your arse handed to you by david owen, david owen ffs, its time to question your future on forums.
What a fun read.
God, I miss that guy.
Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2018 8:29 am
by Ginge
Skewball wrote:DavidOwen67 wrote:ChrisW wrote:Bumpfest at the moment.
Indeed. But specially selected "classics" that need a good airing every now and again.
I think this one is my favourite for so many different reasons.
Yes, it's definitely a favourite of mine. It's just so blatantly obvious it was fixed, across 4 different draws. When you have such ridiculas odds , beyond calculation combined with a clear and obvious motive then it's just beyond debate. It was fixed, there is no other option.
Yet people were trying to pretend it wasn't just to protect their image on here.
It was so weird.
Aye it was a bit odd, as if the PDC were fixing it so that two nobodies played each other each day over a three day weekend
