Don't cry Stents.ifm wrote:You and Garry Really are the stereotypical thick Irish aren't you?Murphio wrote:In that case offering money in the first place 'influences' the result Stents you amadan. Using that logic, the whole concept of 'professional' sport undermines the very integrity of it. Playing for nothing other than the prestige, like Priestley and Taylor did, is actually closer to sport in its purest form than introducing a variable which inevitably affects the performance of the competitors. I know you are probably struggling with this Stents so maybe leave reading it back until the fog clears.ifm wrote:No, you made another stupid attempt at defending the indefensible, if what you say were even credible why would savers and deals be banned?Murphio wrote:Nope; I already addressed that point Stents. Taylor and Priestly had a keen rivalry and both were desperate to beat the other. In any case you could actually argue that offering a monetary incentive in the first place affects the integrity of sport more than their being nothing riding on it. Sport in its purest form is about the reward of winning, of being the best in a chosen field. When you offer a monetary prize you are introducing a variable beyond this reward. A person with plenty in the bank, like Taylor, will potentially have less pressure on him than someone who is desperate for the dough. Have a think about it Stents before you reply with more of your total fuckkwittery.ifm wrote:Murph not getting that having nothing to play for means you don't care if you win or lose, there's a reason deals are banned in many sports, probably darts too.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Oh yeah, because they might influence the results you donut.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I'm astonished you manage to feed and water yourselves.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Integrity in sport - How does darts compare?
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Integrity in sport - How does darts compare?
Re: Integrity in sport - How does darts compare?
You obviously can, however - being a fairly reasonable and intelligent bloke - see the point I'm making? If the removal of a financial incentive potentially affects the outcome and therefore integrity of a sporting event; then taking that reasoning to its logical conclusion means that offering a reward in the first place does exactly the same thing!Rout wrote:Well to go off at a tangent, that's why many people, me included, don't often look at commercialism and capitalism being the bedrock of a sport as a good thing.
People endeavoured to run faster, jump higher and swim longer for no other reason than to be the best in their chosen field. When cash incentives were introduced (or sports became professional) a variable was introduced which inevitably had the potential to impact performance. Perhaps some competitors were inspired to to perform better. Maybe others were burdened with the pressure.
Whatever the case; the removal of financial incentive is closer to sport in its purest form than not. The vast, vast majority of people who play sports competively do so for no financial reward whatsoever. It's called amateurism and the notion the lack of money means competitors aren't bothered (and I know you didn't make the point) is so risable It's not even worth debating.
In a nutshell; if removing a cash incentive for winning a sports event throws up questions of integrity then so too does offering a financial reward in the first place. The one argument is laughing at the other.
Last edited by Murphio on Fri Aug 11, 2017 8:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Superleague Player
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2017 2:08 pm
Re: Integrity in sport - How does darts compare?
That's fair enough. The vast majority of incidents that bring sports integrity into question have money at their root.Rout wrote:Well to go off at a tangent, that's why many people, me included, don't often look at commercialism and capitalism being the bedrock of a sport as a good thing.
I've no objection to sports being played professionally and am happy enough for the elite to earn good livings while they can during what will be a relatively short career, but the obscene amounts of money sloshing around in sports such as football these days does a lot more harm than good in my opinion
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Integrity in sport - How does darts compare?
I have a 9 darter story but I'd have to pm it.....BlueSpark wrote:Have you read Lowes autobiography?ifm wrote:I don't doubt the first part though savers are still a big part of the game today.BlueSpark wrote:Players split for years, Bristow, Lowe, Jocky were all at it.
Used to be part and parcel of the game.
Not so any more.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
He was at it with everyone.
Bristow also wrote that he stopped splitting with John, just before he weighed in with the 9 darter.
Apparently he was gutted.
Always thought it would have been prize money for the tournament winnings split, not personal achievement prizes. However, Lowe said Eric had fekked up, so I guess he would have given him something.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
Madsocks
Madsocks
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Integrity in sport - How does darts compare?
Off you go thenifm wrote:I have a 9 darter story but I'd have to pm it.....BlueSpark wrote:Have you read Lowes autobiography?ifm wrote:I don't doubt the first part though savers are still a big part of the game today.BlueSpark wrote:Players split for years, Bristow, Lowe, Jocky were all at it.
Used to be part and parcel of the game.
Not so any more.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
He was at it with everyone.
Bristow also wrote that he stopped splitting with John, just before he weighed in with the 9 darter.
Apparently he was gutted.
Always thought it would have been prize money for the tournament winnings split, not personal achievement prizes. However, Lowe said Eric had fekked up, so I guess he would have given him something.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Re: Integrity in sport - How does darts compare?
Slightly OT....
Highly suspicious of great british Mo being clean.....the whole Salazar thing doesn't sit right with me.
Highly suspicious of great british Mo being clean.....the whole Salazar thing doesn't sit right with me.
- Ecky Thump
- County Player
- Posts: 4020
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 8:43 am
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Integrity in sport - How does darts compare?
Coral to a small extent , but they have no interest any longer in BDO events.BlueSpark wrote:Well yes.ifm wrote:Jackpotjoy was oneBlueSpark wrote:Apart from all the others?ifm wrote:Apart from all the others, I can't think of one.BlueSpark wrote:
Apart from jackpotjoy what were the others?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Well what were they?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
But there have been plenty apparently
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Integrity in sport - How does darts compare?
Would that be the Phil / Mace story ??ifm wrote:I have a 9 darter story but I'd have to pm it.....BlueSpark wrote:Have you read Lowes autobiography?ifm wrote:I don't doubt the first part though savers are still a big part of the game today.BlueSpark wrote:Players split for years, Bristow, Lowe, Jocky were all at it.
Used to be part and parcel of the game.
Not so any more.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
He was at it with everyone.
Bristow also wrote that he stopped splitting with John, just before he weighed in with the 9 darter.
Apparently he was gutted.
Always thought it would have been prize money for the tournament winnings split, not personal achievement prizes. However, Lowe said Eric had fekked up, so I guess he would have given him something.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Integrity in sport - How does darts compare?
No one knows, as he omitted to send this "story"WCDPA wrote:Would that be the Phil / Mace story ??ifm wrote:I have a 9 darter story but I'd have to pm it.....BlueSpark wrote:Have you read Lowes autobiography?ifm wrote:I don't doubt the first part though savers are still a big part of the game today.BlueSpark wrote:Players split for years, Bristow, Lowe, Jocky were all at it.
Used to be part and parcel of the game.
Not so any more.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
He was at it with everyone.
Bristow also wrote that he stopped splitting with John, just before he weighed in with the 9 darter.
Apparently he was gutted.
Always thought it would have been prize money for the tournament winnings split, not personal achievement prizes. However, Lowe said Eric had fekked up, so I guess he would have given him something.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Integrity in sport - How does darts compare?
Indeed.WCDPA wrote:Would that be the Phil / Mace story ??ifm wrote:I have a 9 darter story but I'd have to pm it.....BlueSpark wrote:Have you read Lowes autobiography?ifm wrote:I don't doubt the first part though savers are still a big part of the game today.BlueSpark wrote:Players split for years, Bristow, Lowe, Jocky were all at it.
Used to be part and parcel of the game.
Not so any more.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
He was at it with everyone.
Bristow also wrote that he stopped splitting with John, just before he weighed in with the 9 darter.
Apparently he was gutted.
Always thought it would have been prize money for the tournament winnings split, not personal achievement prizes. However, Lowe said Eric had fekked up, so I guess he would have given him something.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
Madsocks
Madsocks