ssjsa wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 9:47 pm For those having a correct score bet on the Williams vs Mitchell match, Jim has won the bull.

That's nice

ssjsa wrote:For those having a correct score bet on the Williams vs Mitchell match, Jim has won the bull.

Cheers for the info, mate.

Ginge wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 9:51 pm

ssjsa wrote:For those having a correct score bet on the Williams vs Mitchell match, Jim has won the bull.

Cheers for the info, mate.

Makes my bet of Williams minus 1.5 sets a better one.

Skybet odds on Q School qualification.

Glen Durrant 2/5
Cameron Menzies 6/4
Jim Williams 6/4
Jamie Hughes 7/4
Andrew Gilding 2/1
Andy Boulton 2/1
Richie Burnett 2/1
Scott Waites2/1
Mark McGeeney 9/4
Stephen Burton 5/2
Darren Johnson11/4
Kyle McKinstry11/4
Matthew Dennant11/4
David Evans 3/1
David Pallett 3/1
Kevin Painter 3/1
Nathan Rafferty 3/1
Paul Rowley 3/1
Ritchie Edhouse 3/1
Aden Kirk7/2
Andy Jenkins7/2
Conan Whitehead 7/2
Diogo Portella 7/2
Joe Murnan 7/2
Mark Walsh 7/2
Robbie Green 7/2
Barrie Bates 4/1
Chris Quantock 4/1
Jarred Cole 4/1
Lisa Ashton 4/1
Peter Jacques 4/1
Robert Rickwood 4/1
Scott Taylor 4/1
Steve Hine 4/1
Andy Hamilton 4/1
Barry Lynn 5/2
Darren Beveridge 5/1
Dave Prins 5/1
Jason Wilson 5/1
Keith Geraghty 5/1
Kirk Shepherd 5/1
Mark Frost 5/1
Mark McGrath 5/1
Martin Atkins 5/1
Robert Collins 5/1
Royden Lam 5/1
Ryan Murray 5/1
Stuart Kellett 5/1
Wes Newton 5/1
Andy Chalmers 5/1
Carl Wilkinson 6/1
Dean Reynolds 6/1
John Bowles 6/1
Lee Evans 6/1
Peter Mitchell 6/1
Simon Preston 6/1
Jamie Caven 6/1
Mick Todd 7/1
Gavin Carlin 9/1
Jason Askew 25/1

Ashton 4/1 is absolutely ridiculous. If that was on the exchanges I would be laying a significant amount on it.

Looking at the odds Ssjsa posted above

Durrant was 2/5 (think he was 1/2 for a short period), now 1/3

Not very enticing is it.

ChrisW wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 7:49 am Not very enticing is it.

Not worth the £15 max bet Skybet are letting me have on it

As an aside, if anyone has a Sportingbet account and wants a medium term interest, they are going 17/20 that there will be an average of 108.5 or above at any point in this years PL.

Happened 5 times in last years Taylor-less PL (10 and 14 the totals in the years before that). Max bet about £1100 on it if you have an unrestricted account.

Waites at 2s is easy money.

Skybet not letting you stick accumulators on it is annoying

Zapp Brannigan wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 8:03 am Skybet not letting you stick accumulators on it is annoying

Hardly a surprise.

As far as I am aware, not accepting multiples on the same market is standard industry practice.

I believe the theory goes something like this:
Let's say you want a double on player A and player B to both win one of the X number of cards available.
The prices on offer are for each player to win one of the X cards available.
That's fair enough in itself, but let's say player A wins a card on day 1.
Your bet would then roll over onto player 2 winning one of X cards available, except that market doesn't exist any more, as there are no longer X cards available.
Even though player B's odds on winning a card could now be longer than the price you took, given there are less cards available (especially if he had a bad first day), technically the bet is void because at the time your multiple moves on to player B, the market no longer exists in that form.

Or to put it another way, one part of your bet has had a direct impact on the other part of your bet, and bookies don't like that.

Hope that makes sense.

Bwin/Sportingbet have priced up a few players and you can actually bet AGAINST a few players winning one

First price is to win one, second price is for them NOT to win one.

Durrant 2/5 vs 17/10
McGeeney and Williams 27/4 vs 1/20
McKinstry and Ashton 9/1 vs 1/50
Waites, Hamilton and Ana 14/1 vs 1/100

Rest are just priced up to win one:

Hedman 25/1
Winstanley 33/1

Ginge wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 8:34 am Bwin/Sportingbet have priced up a few players and you can actually bet AGAINST a few players winning one

First price is to win one, second price is for them NOT to win one.

Durrant 2/5 vs 17/10
McGeeney and Williams 27/4 vs 1/20
McKinstry and Ashton 9/1 vs 1/50
Waites, Hamilton and Ana 14/1 vs 1/100

Rest are just priced up to win one:

Hedman 25/1
Winstanley 33/1

And already, most of the above have been ploughed into and cut.

25 minutes and any value was swiftly cut back. 25 minute time lapse....

Not taking bets on Duzza??

DavidB wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 9:12 am Not taking bets on Duzza??

That wasnt in the screenshot, he was 2/5 at the start and is now 3/10. Value was in the four in the screenshot.

Waites 14/1 ffs!!!!

If you think Durrant will bomb you can now get 11/5 though (was 17/10 half an hour back)

Ginge wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 9:14 am

DavidB wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 9:12 am Not taking bets on Duzza??

That wasnt in the screenshot, he was 2/5 at the start and is now 3/10. Value was in the four in the screenshot.

Waites 14/1 ffs!!!!

Ah that was sort of my question!

Wasn't Waites something like 30-1 to win Lakeside??