ifm wrote:Murph, this is getting worrisome, if you're not chasing me you're mentioning me in every post, get help.
Hey Murph, why don’t you start a thread about yourself, then bump it up when no one gives a shite about it.
#worrisome.
Hi Dave, just jump on in.
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
Ginge wrote:An utterly retarded scam, did they really think people would not query why payments were not showing on their accounts?
Remember these were unclaimed payments so I would imagine that the company had made a refund request which was accepted and then had a letter to ask for a bank account and for whatever reason HMRC never heard from them for maybe a year. That meant that there would be an allocated amount sat there waiting for the company to contact HMRC again with bank details. After a year or two the company may be no more or just forgotten about it hence this woman thinking she would never get caught.
Someone found a letter or remembered their refund and asked about it which was how they were caught. If they were clever or not so greedy then they would only take the money from companies that had since gone bust or ceased trading.
Ginge wrote:An utterly retarded scam, did they really think people would not query why payments were not showing on their accounts?
Remember these were unclaimed payments so I would imagine that the company had made a refund request which was accepted and then had a letter to ask for a bank account and for whatever reason HMRC never heard from them for maybe a year. That meant that there would be an allocated amount sat there waiting for the company to contact HMRC again with bank details. After a year or two the company may be no more or just forgotten about it hence this woman thinking she would never get caught.
Someone found a letter or remembered their refund and asked about it which was how they were caught. If they were clever or not so greedy then they would only take the money from companies that had since gone bust or ceased trading.
Zeyes wrote:By the way, I've been meaning to ask: What exactly are "unqualified accountants" in this context?
People who post on forums as authoritative experts on a subject they know little about such as contract law.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
Zeyes wrote:By the way, I've been meaning to ask: What exactly are "unqualified accountants" in this context?
They won't have a qualification with a recognised accounting body such as ICAEW, ACCA, ICAS etc.
They can still hold themselves out to trade as an "Accountant", but not as a "Chartered" of "Certified" Accountant (these are the biggest institutes covering private practice) and also means there is no-one to complain to or to censure their behaviour.
Zeyes wrote:By the way, I've been meaning to ask: What exactly are "unqualified accountants" in this context?
They won't have a qualification with a recognised accounting body such as ICAEW, ACCA, ICAS etc.
They can still hold themselves out to trade as an "Accountant", but not as a "Chartered" of "Certified" Accountant (these are the biggest institutes covering private practice) and also means there is no-one to complain to or to censure their behaviour.
That's what i said
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"