Interesting email sent out....

[Zapp Brannigan]

There is a sense of irony that the main issue with the board at the minute is transparency and not answering questions and then the first time the potential new head of the board is asked a question his answer was “no I will not be answering anything or retracting anything”

We had hope.......... if only for a day.

[ifm]

There is a sense of irony that the main issue with the board at the minute is transparency and not answering questions and then the first time the potential new head of the board is asked a question his answer was “no I will not be answering anything or retracting anything”

We had hope.......... if only for a day.

Yes, entirely comparable.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[Zapp Brannigan]

There is a sense of irony that the main issue with the board at the minute is transparency and not answering questions and then the first time the potential new head of the board is asked a question his answer was “no I will not be answering anything or retracting anything”

We had hope.......... if only for a day.

Yes, entirely comparable.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Im all for him taking over but you have to admit he doesn't take criticism and debate very well and its something hes going to have to work on, by either walking away from social media completely or getting someone on the board who will speak on social media on the BDOs behalf (the company desperately needs to get someone involed who understands social media presence but thats a different argument all together)

[ifm]

There is a sense of irony that the main issue with the board at the minute is transparency and not answering questions and then the first time the potential new head of the board is asked a question his answer was “no I will not be answering anything or retracting anything”

We had hope.......... if only for a day.

Yes, entirely comparable.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Im all for him taking over but you have to admit he doesn't take criticism and debate very well and its something hes going to have to work on, by either walking away from social media completely or getting someone on the board who will speak on social media on the BDOs behalf (the company desperately needs to get someone involed who understands social media presence but thats a different argument all together)

So him refusing to get into an argument with Rout somehow translates into him not taking criticism or debates well.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[Zapp Brannigan]

There is a sense of irony that the main issue with the board at the minute is transparency and not answering questions and then the first time the potential new head of the board is asked a question his answer was “no I will not be answering anything or retracting anything”

We had hope.......... if only for a day.

Yes, entirely comparable.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Im all for him taking over but you have to admit he doesn't take criticism and debate very well and its something hes going to have to work on, by either walking away from social media completely or getting someone on the board who will speak on social media on the BDOs behalf (the company desperately needs to get someone involed who understands social media presence but thats a different argument all together)

So him refusing to get into an argument with Rout somehow translates into him not taking criticism or debates well.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

You dont think routs question were valid?

hes slated that site for months and months, calling it a hate group on more than one occasion. Then he comes back on and doesn't expect to be called out on it when he first posts on it, which coincidentally ties with him trying to get votes to take over the company the group is discussing.

That is 100% not expecting to be held accountable for your previous comments or actions and refusing to accept criticism

[ifm]

There is a sense of irony that the main issue with the board at the minute is transparency and not answering questions and then the first time the potential new head of the board is asked a question his answer was “no I will not be answering anything or retracting anything”

We had hope.......... if only for a day.

Yes, entirely comparable.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Im all for him taking over but you have to admit he doesn't take criticism and debate very well and its something hes going to have to work on, by either walking away from social media completely or getting someone on the board who will speak on social media on the BDOs behalf (the company desperately needs to get someone involed who understands social media presence but thats a different argument all together)

So him refusing to get into an argument with Rout somehow translates into him not taking criticism or debates well.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

You dont think routs question were valid?

hes slated that site for months and months, calling it a hate group on more than one occasion. Then he comes back on and doesn't expect to be called out on it when he first posts on it, which coincidentally ties with him trying to get votes to take over the company the group is discussing.

That is 100% not expecting to be held accountable for your previous comments or actions and refusing to accept criticism

Rout decided to troll him for what?
Its a hate site?
Newsflash, it was set up as a fuck you to Egerton and original fanatics and contains all the real haters who were banned legitimately from the first group.
And of course its no coincidence, like its no coincidence he meets with a bloke he hates in order to soft soap because he wants the Lancs vote.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[WCDPA]

Yes, entirely comparable.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Im all for him taking over but you have to admit he doesn't take criticism and debate very well and its something hes going to have to work on, by either walking away from social media completely or getting someone on the board who will speak on social media on the BDOs behalf (the company desperately needs to get someone involed who understands social media presence but thats a different argument all together)

So him refusing to get into an argument with Rout somehow translates into him not taking criticism or debates well.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

You dont think routs question were valid?

hes slated that site for months and months, calling it a hate group on more than one occasion. Then he comes back on and doesn't expect to be called out on it when he first posts on it, which coincidentally ties with him trying to get votes to take over the company the group is discussing.

That is 100% not expecting to be held accountable for your previous comments or actions and refusing to accept criticism

Rout decided to troll him for what?
Its a hate site?
Newsflash, it was set up as a fek you to Egerton and original fanatics and contains all the real haters who were banned legitimately from the first group.
And of course its no coincidence, like its no coincidence he meets with a bloke he hates in order to soft soap because he wants the Lancs vote.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Pot kettle black IFM, you accused me earlier of stopping low , and said the site was formed for the haters who were legitimately banned from original fanatics ! Ffs some were banned for asking a polite question about the board , for sure there was a bit of trolling by some , but not to the extent that happens on here on a daily basis .

[ifm]

Im all for him taking over but you have to admit he doesn't take criticism and debate very well and its something hes going to have to work on, by either walking away from social media completely or getting someone on the board who will speak on social media on the BDOs behalf (the company desperately needs to get someone involed who understands social media presence but thats a different argument all together)

So him refusing to get into an argument with Rout somehow translates into him not taking criticism or debates well.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

You dont think routs question were valid?

hes slated that site for months and months, calling it a hate group on more than one occasion. Then he comes back on and doesn't expect to be called out on it when he first posts on it, which coincidentally ties with him trying to get votes to take over the company the group is discussing.

That is 100% not expecting to be held accountable for your previous comments or actions and refusing to accept criticism

Rout decided to troll him for what?
Its a hate site?
Newsflash, it was set up as a fek you to Egerton and original fanatics and contains all the real haters who were banned legitimately from the first group.
And of course its no coincidence, like its no coincidence he meets with a bloke he hates in order to soft soap because he wants the Lancs vote.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Pot kettle black IFM, you accused me earlier of stopping low , and said the site was formed for the haters who were legitimately banned from original fanatics ! Ffs some were banned for asking a polite question about the board , for sure there was a bit of trolling by some , but not to the extent that happens on here on a daily basis .

Reread what I said.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[Little Lonely Garry]

Im all for him taking over but you have to admit he doesn't take criticism and debate very well and its something hes going to have to work on, by either walking away from social media completely or getting someone on the board who will speak on social media on the BDOs behalf (the company desperately needs to get someone involed who understands social media presence but thats a different argument all together)

So him refusing to get into an argument with Rout somehow translates into him not taking criticism or debates well.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

You dont think routs question were valid?

hes slated that site for months and months, calling it a hate group on more than one occasion. Then he comes back on and doesn't expect to be called out on it when he first posts on it, which coincidentally ties with him trying to get votes to take over the company the group is discussing.

That is 100% not expecting to be held accountable for your previous comments or actions and refusing to accept criticism

Rout decided to troll him for what?
Its a hate site?
Newsflash, it was set up as a fek you to Egerton and original fanatics and contains all the real haters who were banned legitimately from the first group.
And of course its no coincidence, like its no coincidence he meets with a bloke he hates in order to soft soap because he wants the Lancs vote.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Pot kettle black IFM, you accused me earlier of stopping low , and said the site was formed for the haters who were legitimately banned from original fanatics ! Ffs some were banned for asking a polite question about the board , for sure there was a bit of trolling by some , but not to the extent that happens on here on a daily basis .

except you dont get banned here.
on your facebook groups people do get banned

[nikkiboy]

So him refusing to get into an argument with Rout somehow translates into him not taking criticism or debates well.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

You dont think routs question were valid?

hes slated that site for months and months, calling it a hate group on more than one occasion. Then he comes back on and doesn't expect to be called out on it when he first posts on it, which coincidentally ties with him trying to get votes to take over the company the group is discussing.

That is 100% not expecting to be held accountable for your previous comments or actions and refusing to accept criticism

Rout decided to troll him for what?
Its a hate site?
Newsflash, it was set up as a fek you to Egerton and original fanatics and contains all the real haters who were banned legitimately from the first group.
And of course its no coincidence, like its no coincidence he meets with a bloke he hates in order to soft soap because he wants the Lancs vote.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Pot kettle black IFM, you accused me earlier of stopping low , and said the site was formed for the haters who were legitimately banned from original fanatics ! Ffs some were banned for asking a polite question about the board , for sure there was a bit of trolling by some , but not to the extent that happens on here on a daily basis .

except you dont get banned here.
on your facebook groups people do get banned

It's also a closed group remember so you have to be approved by admin to join or read.

[Booji Boy]

And right on queue
LOL

*cue

One of my other spelling annoyances (cue/queue/que)

I always use line as I can never remember how to spell the other word.

[ifm]

It seems that Tommy despite saying he was done with all things BDO and was not making an arse of himself on facebook anymore has decided on a campaign against the BDO on facebook..............

[Astonvilla]

I love this expression "haters". It tell you so much about any person that uses it.

[devosteve]

It seems that Tommy despite saying he was done with all things BDO and was not making an arse of himself on facebook anymore has decided on a campaign against the BDO on facebook..............

How's this? On his fb he has only been having a pop at his new sky box.

What's this campaign he has started up against the BDO?

[nikkiboy]

It seems that Tommy despite saying he was done with all things BDO and was not making an arse of himself on facebook anymore has decided on a campaign against the BDO on facebook..............

How's this? On his fb he has only been having a pop at his new sky box.

What's this campaign he has started up against the BDO?

Look at who accused him Devo, now TT probably just didn't like one of Des' posts and that to ifm constitutes a hate campaign.

[ifm]

It seems that Tommy despite saying he was done with all things BDO and was not making an arse of himself on facebook anymore has decided on a campaign against the BDO on facebook..............

How's this? On his fb he has only been having a pop at his new sky box.

What's this campaign he has started up against the BDO?

Look at who accused him Devo, now TT probably just didn't like one of Des' posts and that to ifm constitutes a hate campaign.

What the hell are you going on about now?

[devosteve]

So when is ifm going to show us this campaign that TT has started against the bdo?

[ifm]

So when is ifm going to show us this campaign that TT has started against the bdo?

I'm surprised Marky hasn't pasted it yet.

[ChrisW]

So when is ifm going to show us this campaign that TT has started against the bdo?

Why does he need to post it. Never understood the whole copy paste from FB.

[WCDPA]

So him refusing to get into an argument with Rout somehow translates into him not taking criticism or debates well.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

You dont think routs question were valid?

hes slated that site for months and months, calling it a hate group on more than one occasion. Then he comes back on and doesn't expect to be called out on it when he first posts on it, which coincidentally ties with him trying to get votes to take over the company the group is discussing.

That is 100% not expecting to be held accountable for your previous comments or actions and refusing to accept criticism

Rout decided to troll him for what?
Its a hate site?
Newsflash, it was set up as a fek you to Egerton and original fanatics and contains all the real haters who were banned legitimately from the first group.
And of course its no coincidence, like its no coincidence he meets with a bloke he hates in order to soft soap because he wants the Lancs vote.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Pot kettle black IFM, you accused me earlier of stopping low , and said the site was formed for the haters who were legitimately banned from original fanatics ! Ffs some were banned for asking a polite question about the board , for sure there was a bit of trolling by some , but not to the extent that happens on here on a daily basis .

except you dont get banned here.
on your facebook groups people do get banned

Only admin on 1 FB group and I would imagine you have had more bans yourself on here than our group has