As for some of the other ones, yes they clearly infer it. But not everyone in a picture with a paedo is a paedo themselves, that is just plain silly.
So just for the record you are saying that in your opinion there was never any intent to infer that ssja was a paedo, it is completely unreasonable to think that that was the intention.
Im merely saying not everyone in a picture with a paedo is a paedo themselves. The rest is your imagination running riot.
As for some of the other ones, yes they clearly infer it. But not everyone in a picture with a paedo is a paedo themselves, that is just plain silly.
So just for the record you are saying that in your opinion there was never any intent to infer that ssja was a paedo, it is completely unreasonable to think that that was the intention.
Im merely saying not everyone in a picture with a paedo is a paedo themselves. The rest is your imagination running riot.
Hope this helps.
How about the one with Saville I think and a sign that says 'watch kids' with a mod's head photoshopped in the pic say 'oh OK'
As for some of the other ones, yes they clearly infer it. But not everyone in a picture with a paedo is a paedo themselves, that is just plain silly.
So just for the record you are saying that in your opinion there was never any intent to infer that ssja was a paedo, it is completely unreasonable to think that that was the intention.
Im merely saying not everyone in a picture with a paedo is a paedo themselves. The rest is your imagination running riot.
Hope this helps.
How about the one with Saville I think and a sign that says 'watch kids' with a mod's head photoshopped in the pic say 'oh OK'
Is that not inferrence enough?
Oh that one is. The bog standard one is merely up to your own interpretation.
Moongoose McQueeen wrote:Thanks Col. I would apply the rules that have been in place for years in a fair manner. Common sense is a great tool.
although the fairest admin i have ever come across on darts forums in never messing with accounts, you are too tall to be an admin of a darts forum which are usually midgets
i am so sorry for my actions these last ten years, i'm going through a tough time
Moongoose McQueeen wrote:Thanks Col. I would apply the rules that have been in place for years in a fair manner. Common sense is a great tool.
although the fairest admin i have ever come across on darts forums in never messing with accounts, you are too tall to be an admin of a darts forum which are usually midgets
Moongoose McQueeen wrote:Thanks Col. I would apply the rules that have been in place for years in a fair manner. Common sense is a great tool.
although the fairest admin i have ever come across on darts forums in never messing with accounts, you are too tall to be an admin of a darts forum which are usually midgets
We prefer the term 'little people'
welcome to Lilliput
i am so sorry for my actions these last ten years, i'm going through a tough time
Moongoose McQueeen wrote:Thanks Col. I would apply the rules that have been in place for years in a fair manner. Common sense is a great tool.
although the fairest admin i have ever come across on darts forums in never messing with accounts, you are too tall to be an admin of a darts forum which are usually midgets
You have been black balled! I wonder which mod did that?
I don't think they actually had a vote Marv
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
If that's a no then fair enough. I would have done it seriously and followed whatever guidelines you have in place. Wish you guys all the best in your search for another mod.
Moongoose McQueeen wrote:If that's a no then fair enough. I would have done it seriously and followed whatever guidelines you have in place. Wish you guys all the best in your search for another mod.
Like you were ever serious anyway, you've got enough on your plate with df.