They were delighted with the coverage (they all watched it on telly. None of them actually bought a ticket and went)markymark wrote:Bowls Fanatics were abuzz.
Did Mervyn King bring his A-game to the green?Buzz Fledderjohn wrote:They were delighted with the coverage (they all watched it on telly. None of them actually bought a ticket and went)markymark wrote:Bowls Fanatics were abuzz.
They were less pleased with the lads over on The Stars Of Bowls forum who just took the piss throughout the entire event.
Depends who's bowling or arm wrestling I suppose.phil davies wrote:Be lucky to get more than 10,000
21st April 2016 7:01amGinge wrote:the cancer has been cut from the BDO
Nearly right. The answer could be 2. The average figure and the peak figure.Duterprat wrote:one viewing figure per session, one would think.
So your trying to say that the viewership of the channel is increasing week on week causing non mainstream sports like bowls to gain greater audiences.Ginge wrote:The highest rated WDT session on Freesports was 9k for the Wednesday night.
Test Match Bowls (on a Wednesday morning at 8am on the 6th June, one week later) got 12k.
I'm saying nuffin'....
Fair enough, I swear I had seen Bob there presenting the trophy!only85 wrote:just for clarity its a different potters family at norfolk bowls , thats all from tv corner
