Re: PDC Premier League 2019
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 12:24 pm
Should have won
Shome one will be along shortly to tell you to shut the feck upDavidOwen67 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:29 pm Lowest average of 95?
But, but, but.... I was told that PDC televised events are littered with averages in the 70s and 80s.
Surely shome mistake?
His draw definitely could have been worse and could have been better, but he does have a point. What I would say though is even if the table rankings for this year are a bit ludicrous, the contender games are ones the big guns will either be favourites or more or less 50-50. Above all I'm glad that he's speaking his mind and not being gagged by Hearn
Can you come back to us when you have actually watched the interview.Garry Murphy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:03 pmhypocrisy...the same mardle was one of those screaming out how price should be punished when it happened
really einstein ?ssjsa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:07 pmCan you come back to us when you have actually watched the interview.Garry Murphy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:03 pmhypocrisy...the same mardle was one of those screaming out how price should be punished when it happened
Mardle is not disputing that Price should have been punished, but rather the severity of the fine.
The poster known as Garry Murphy doesn't bother with a little thing like that when he has a chance to moan like a bitch hahassjsa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:07 pmCan you come back to us when you have actually watched the interview.Garry Murphy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:03 pmhypocrisy...the same mardle was one of those screaming out how price should be punished when it happened
Mardle is not disputing that Price should have been punished, but rather the severity of the fine.
Deflectors on full mode.Garry Murphy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:17 pmreally einstein ?ssjsa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:07 pmCan you come back to us when you have actually watched the interview.Garry Murphy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:03 pmhypocrisy...the same mardle was one of those screaming out how price should be punished when it happened
Mardle is not disputing that Price should have been punished, but rather the severity of the fine.
It was partly because of people like mardle who screamed loud enough and drew so much attention to it that the fine was so large.
Mardle went out of his way to make it out like he was committing some major crime which made it more public, which in turned made the fine possibly higher.
For the record I do not think the fine was excessive considering he earned six figures from his win.
But feel free to moan and argue because of the poster than the actual point being made.
the only one deflecting is you since you could not address the points made.ssjsa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 10:47 pmDeflectors on full mode.Garry Murphy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:17 pmreally einstein ?ssjsa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:07 pmCan you come back to us when you have actually watched the interview.Garry Murphy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:03 pmhypocrisy...the same mardle was one of those screaming out how price should be punished when it happened
Mardle is not disputing that Price should have been punished, but rather the severity of the fine.
It was partly because of people like mardle who screamed loud enough and drew so much attention to it that the fine was so large.
Mardle went out of his way to make it out like he was committing some major crime which made it more public, which in turned made the fine possibly higher.
For the record I do not think the fine was excessive considering he earned six figures from his win.
But feel free to moan and argue because of the poster than the actual point being made.
I wish the poster known as Garry Murphy could make his mind up.Garry Murphy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:29 amthe only one deflecting is you since you could not address the points made.ssjsa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 10:47 pmDeflectors on full mode.Garry Murphy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:17 pmreally einstein ?ssjsa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:07 pmCan you come back to us when you have actually watched the interview.Garry Murphy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:03 pm
hypocrisy...the same mardle was one of those screaming out how price should be punished when it happened
Mardle is not disputing that Price should have been punished, but rather the severity of the fine.
It was partly because of people like mardle who screamed loud enough and drew so much attention to it that the fine was so large.
Mardle went out of his way to make it out like he was committing some major crime which made it more public, which in turned made the fine possibly higher.
For the record I do not think the fine was excessive considering he earned six figures from his win.
But feel free to moan and argue because of the poster than the actual point being made.
Ando choked, got a warning and pulled a sulk, and phil taylor was right, he did not deserve a fine, was done to placate a sore loser ando who choked
ssjsa wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:22 amI wish the poster known as Garry Murphy could make his mind up.Garry Murphy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:29 amthe only one deflecting is you since you could not address the points made.ssjsa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 10:47 pmDeflectors on full mode.Garry Murphy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:17 pmreally einstein ?
It was partly because of people like mardle who screamed loud enough and drew so much attention to it that the fine was so large.
Mardle went out of his way to make it out like he was committing some major crime which made it more public, which in turned made the fine possibly higher.
For the record I do not think the fine was excessive considering he earned six figures from his win.
But feel free to moan and argue because of the poster than the actual point being made.
Ando choked, got a warning and pulled a sulk, and phil taylor was right, he did not deserve a fine, was done to placate a sore loser ando who choked