As it stands we have someone leading the Forum comp who has made one post to enter a competition with prize, vanished, and hasnt logged back in since. This person hasnt contributed to the forum and is potentially going to be winning a prize from under the noses of those that do.

The Moderators in their wisdom decided to scrap the rule last year where you had to have XX number of posts.

So should this rule be brought back?

Vote now

Is that better Chris?


Bring the rule back, get rid of the freeloaders who shamelessly contribute nothing and who never will ...

ha ha , brilliant.

Great minds, Ginge, great minds lol

I just started a thread before you did, ffs.

Ginge wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:00 pm I just started a thread before you did, ffs.

the more the merrier

And before anyone accuses me of being bitter, I didnt actually enter the Lakeside competition.

Ginge wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:03 pm And before anyone accuses me of being bitter, I didnt actually enter the Lakeside competition.

neither did I, exactly because there was no rule, and said so at the time.

Ginge has never entered a Lakeside comp.
Should be banned from all competitions for not supporting our sponsor.

Chris voting no, there.

Reminds me of the Brexit referendum.
Don't get the answer you want so you ask again.

ChrisW wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:10 pm Reminds me of the Brexit referendum.
Don't get the answer you want so you ask again.

Except in this case the decision to lift the ban was decided by three people. Just letting them know how the wider forum feels.

Ginge wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:12 pm

ChrisW wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:10 pm Reminds me of the Brexit referendum.
Don't get the answer you want so you ask again.

Except in this case the decision to lift the ban was decided by three people. Just letting them know how the wider forum feels.

Does the sponsor get a say?

ChrisW wrote:

Ginge wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:12 pm

ChrisW wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:10 pm Reminds me of the Brexit referendum.
Don't get the answer you want so you ask again.

Except in this case the decision to lift the ban was decided by three people. Just letting them know how the wider forum feels.

Does the sponsor get a say?

Did they in the first place ?

Skewball wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:15 pm

ChrisW wrote:

Ginge wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:12 pm

ChrisW wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:10 pm Reminds me of the Brexit referendum.
Don't get the answer you want so you ask again.

Except in this case the decision to lift the ban was decided by three people. Just letting them know how the wider forum feels.

Does the sponsor get a say?

Did they in the first place ?

Yes.

Well in this case the sponsors are idiots.

Welsh sheep shagging idiots.

Ginge wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:16 pm Well in this case the sponsors are idiots.

Welsh sheep shagging idiots.

You don''t know what they said yet.

ChrisW wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:16 pm

Skewball wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:15 pm

ChrisW wrote:

Ginge wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:12 pm

ChrisW wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:10 pm Reminds me of the Brexit referendum.
Don't get the answer you want so you ask again.

Except in this case the decision to lift the ban was decided by three people. Just letting them know how the wider forum feels.

Does the sponsor get a say?

Did they in the first place ?

Yes.

show us

ha Plenty of seething here

Sounds familar when the originator mocks a certain BDO player for having an opinion about PDC players doing similar in comps

The PDC have a post count requirement for entering their dart events?

Oh dear