Page 7 of 23

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:07 pm
by nikkiboy
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:25 pm
nikkiboy wrote:Whilst he is having a pop at Basgooner's copyright theft
At least you admit it was theft, fair play
We are making progress.
Where did I ever say otherwise?

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:16 pm
by Ginge
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:25 pm
nikkiboy wrote:Whilst he is having a pop at Basgooner's copyright theft
At least you admit it was theft, fair play
We are making progress.
Where did I ever say otherwise?
Dont recall you saying it when you were allowing him to promote them on here. But maybe i wasnt paying attention.

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:23 pm
by nikkiboy
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:16 pm
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:25 pm
nikkiboy wrote:Whilst he is having a pop at Basgooner's copyright theft
At least you admit it was theft, fair play
We are making progress.
Where did I ever say otherwise?
Dont recall you saying it when you were allowing him to promote them on here. But maybe i wasnt paying attention.
As I reminded you a couple of days ago my contention was that if you remove his signature link then you also have to remove JC's as both linked to copyright theft, yet you only got your knickers in a twist over the one, funny that and I wonder why that was?

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:31 pm
by ChrisW
nikkiboy wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:16 pm
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:25 pm
nikkiboy wrote:Whilst he is having a pop at Basgooner's copyright theft
At least you admit it was theft, fair play
We are making progress.
Where did I ever say otherwise?
Dont recall you saying it when you were allowing him to promote them on here. But maybe i wasnt paying attention.
As I reminded you a couple of days ago my contention was that if you remove his signature link then you also have to remove JC's as both linked to copyright theft, yet you only got your knickers in a twist over the one, funny that and I wonder why that was?
Hmmm I wonder why :)

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:32 pm
by nikkiboy
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:16 pm
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:25 pm
nikkiboy wrote:Whilst he is having a pop at Basgooner's copyright theft
At least you admit it was theft, fair play
We are making progress.
Where did I ever say otherwise?
Dont recall you saying it when you were allowing him to promote them on here. But maybe i wasnt paying attention.
May I also point out that in your current signature there is a link to a YouTube video of Alan Partridge saying 'subhuman scum' but on closer inspection it is not the official copyright license holder's channel and is therefore infringing copyright and has been illegally produced.

Now you will probably come back with 'it's not for sale' but the video is monetised using Google/YouTube adverts so you are happy to link to copyright theft for profit but mount that high horse if others do the same.

Just for clarity, basgooner's site was never promoted by the site but was a web link in his signature, just like JC's was and yours is.

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:51 pm
by ILAD
nikkiboy wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:32 pm
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:16 pm
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:25 pm
nikkiboy wrote:Whilst he is having a pop at Basgooner's copyright theft
At least you admit it was theft, fair play
We are making progress.
Where did I ever say otherwise?
Dont recall you saying it when you were allowing him to promote them on here. But maybe i wasnt paying attention.
May I also point out that in your current signature there is a link to a YouTube video of Alan Partridge saying 'subhuman scum' but on closer inspection it is not the official copyright license holder's channel and is therefore infringing copyright and has been illegally produced.

Now you will probably come back with 'it's not for sale' but the video is monetised using Google/YouTube adverts so you are happy to link to copyright theft for profit but mount that high horse if others do the same.

Just for clarity, basgooner's site was never promoted by the site but was a web link in his signature, just like JC's was and yours is.

Stop picking on him, he will cry. :grin:

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:46 am
by Ginge
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:16 pm
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:25 pm
nikkiboy wrote:Whilst he is having a pop at Basgooner's copyright theft
At least you admit it was theft, fair play
We are making progress.
Where did I ever say otherwise?
Dont recall you saying it when you were allowing him to promote them on here. But maybe i wasnt paying attention.
May I also point out that in your current signature there is a link to a YouTube video of Alan Partridge saying 'subhuman scum' but on closer inspection it is not the official copyright license holder's channel and is therefore infringing copyright and has been illegally produced.

Now you will probably come back with 'it's not for sale' but the video is monetised using Google/YouTube adverts so you are happy to link to copyright theft for profit but mount that high horse if others do the same.

Just for clarity, basgooner's site was never promoted by the site but was a web link in his signature, just like JC's was and yours is.
Didnt you let him run a competition on here where the prize was a huge number of the illegal DVDs? Did find the thread the other day, maybe i should bump it.

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:34 am
by ChrisW
ILAD wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:51 pm
nikkiboy wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:32 pm
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:16 pm
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:25 pm

At least you admit it was theft, fair play
We are making progress.
Where did I ever say otherwise?
Dont recall you saying it when you were allowing him to promote them on here. But maybe i wasnt paying attention.
May I also point out that in your current signature there is a link to a YouTube video of Alan Partridge saying 'subhuman scum' but on closer inspection it is not the official copyright license holder's channel and is therefore infringing copyright and has been illegally produced.

Now you will probably come back with 'it's not for sale' but the video is monetised using Google/YouTube adverts so you are happy to link to copyright theft for profit but mount that high horse if others do the same.

Just for clarity, basgooner's site was never promoted by the site but was a web link in his signature, just like JC's was and yours is.

Stop picking on him, he will cry. :grin:
It's started.

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:38 am
by Ginge
Stated where?

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 10:49 am
by ChrisW
Ginge wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:38 amStated where?
Over the road. :)

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:09 am
by Paddy McGinty
Ginge getting truly hammered here...........

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:10 am
by Ginge
Yes i am gutted he has finally faced justice.

25th was the sentencing wasnt it? Ill ring the court up in the afternoon to find out what he got.

And.....go!

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:15 am
by Paddy McGinty
Ginge wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:10 am Yes i am gutted he has finally faced justice.

25th was the sentencing wasnt it? Ill ring the court up in the afternoon to find out what he got.

And.....go!
Well you're at it see if you can book your other mate in for copyright infringements...........I like to see fair play.

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:16 am
by Zapp Brannigan
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:16 pm
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:25 pm
nikkiboy wrote:Whilst he is having a pop at Basgooner's copyright theft
At least you admit it was theft, fair play
We are making progress.
Where did I ever say otherwise?
Dont recall you saying it when you were allowing him to promote them on here. But maybe i wasnt paying attention.
May I also point out that in your current signature there is a link to a YouTube video of Alan Partridge saying 'subhuman scum' but on closer inspection it is not the official copyright license holder's channel and is therefore infringing copyright and has been illegally produced.

Now you will probably come back with 'it's not for sale' but the video is monetised using Google/YouTube adverts so you are happy to link to copyright theft for profit but mount that high horse if others do the same.

Just for clarity, basgooner's site was never promoted by the site but was a web link in his signature, just like JC's was and yours is.

Not to jump into this utterly pointless debate but that’s not how YouTube works

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:23 am
by Ginge
Paddy McGinty wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:10 am Yes i am gutted he has finally faced justice.

25th was the sentencing wasnt it? Ill ring the court up in the afternoon to find out what he got.

And.....go!
Well you're at it see if you can book your other mate in for copyright infringements...........I like to see fair play.
Dont think thats how courts work, mate

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:23 am
by Ginge
Zapp Brannigan wrote:
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:16 pm
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:25 pm At least you admit it was theft, fair play
We are making progress.
Where did I ever say otherwise?
Dont recall you saying it when you were allowing him to promote them on here. But maybe i wasnt paying attention.
May I also point out that in your current signature there is a link to a YouTube video of Alan Partridge saying 'subhuman scum' but on closer inspection it is not the official copyright license holder's channel and is therefore infringing copyright and has been illegally produced.

Now you will probably come back with 'it's not for sale' but the video is monetised using Google/YouTube adverts so you are happy to link to copyright theft for profit but mount that high horse if others do the same.

Just for clarity, basgooner's site was never promoted by the site but was a web link in his signature, just like JC's was and yours is.

Not to jump into this utterly pointless debate but that’s not how YouTube works
Ha!

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 1:59 pm
by nikkiboy
Zapp Brannigan wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:16 am
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:16 pm
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:25 pm

At least you admit it was theft, fair play
We are making progress.
Where did I ever say otherwise?
Dont recall you saying it when you were allowing him to promote them on here. But maybe i wasnt paying attention.
May I also point out that in your current signature there is a link to a YouTube video of Alan Partridge saying 'subhuman scum' but on closer inspection it is not the official copyright license holder's channel and is therefore infringing copyright and has been illegally produced.

Now you will probably come back with 'it's not for sale' but the video is monetised using Google/YouTube adverts so you are happy to link to copyright theft for profit but mount that high horse if others do the same.

Just for clarity, basgooner's site was never promoted by the site but was a web link in his signature, just like JC's was and yours is.

Not to jump into this utterly pointless debate but that’s not how YouTube works
That's strange because I have a couple of videos on there that are monetised and I've earned a few pennies from them over the years.

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 2:09 pm
by DavidB
nikkiboy wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:32 pm
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:16 pm
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:25 pm
nikkiboy wrote:Whilst he is having a pop at Basgooner's copyright theft
At least you admit it was theft, fair play
We are making progress.
Where did I ever say otherwise?
Dont recall you saying it when you were allowing him to promote them on here. But maybe i wasnt paying attention.
May I also point out that in your current signature there is a link to a YouTube video of Alan Partridge saying 'subhuman scum' but on closer inspection it is not the official copyright license holder's channel and is therefore infringing copyright and has been illegally produced.

Now you will probably come back with 'it's not for sale' but the video is monetised using Google/YouTube adverts so you are happy to link to copyright theft for profit but mount that high horse if others do the same.

Just for clarity, basgooner's site was never promoted by the site but was a web link in his signature, just like JC's was and yours is.



ha, Well played nikkiboy, very well played

:grin:

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 2:38 pm
by Zapp Brannigan
nikkiboy wrote:
Zapp Brannigan wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:16 am
nikkiboy wrote:
Ginge wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:16 pm
nikkiboy wrote: Where did I ever say otherwise?
Dont recall you saying it when you were allowing him to promote them on here. But maybe i wasnt paying attention.
May I also point out that in your current signature there is a link to a YouTube video of Alan Partridge saying 'subhuman scum' but on closer inspection it is not the official copyright license holder's channel and is therefore infringing copyright and has been illegally produced.

Now you will probably come back with 'it's not for sale' but the video is monetised using Google/YouTube adverts so you are happy to link to copyright theft for profit but mount that high horse if others do the same.

Just for clarity, basgooner's site was never promoted by the site but was a web link in his signature, just like JC's was and yours is.

Not to jump into this utterly pointless debate but that’s not how YouTube works
That's strange because I have a couple of videos on there that are monetised and I've earned a few pennies from them over the years.
But that’s not what you said

The onus for copyrighted material is not on the person posting it, if you post a copyrighted clip YouTube’s computer systems will flag the video immediately and send any advertising revenue to the person that owns the material or if they do not wish it to be on YouTube they will remove it.

And that’s only if it’s a popular video and a video that qualifies for ads in the first place.

And that’s from experience of having a YouTube channel with videos with copyrighted material on them

Re: Basgooner

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 2:45 pm
by ChrisW
Hang on Ginge didn't create the clip. Why are you even discussing it.