Re: If the BDO survives and someone new takes over.
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:34 pm
So am I (well not directly as I don't live in his constituency), but the last election was the easiest choice I've ever had to make.
So am I (well not directly as I don't live in his constituency), but the last election was the easiest choice I've ever had to make.
"then your use too". I don't suppose she'll be winning the Nobel Prize in Literature in the near future.
He's been a loss to darts chat over the last couple of years.Paddy McGinty wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:40 pmHe is a man of darts, so knowledgable......
Adams may be right but although he has been one of the greatest dart players of all time he would not be a suitable person to run the BDO.Murphio wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:33 pm Very difficult to fathom how someone who has taken the BDO to the brink of collpase still appears to have pockets of support. I know we all like a bit of banter and sometimes it's fun to poke fun at their ineptitude but I don't want to see the BDO disappear and I believe that goes for the vast majority of darts fans. I also think there is room for the two World Championships to coexist even if one drops 'professional' from the title and works in tandem with the PDC to reuinfy the sport, perhaps, under the WDF umbrella. Adams is correct - the battle for pro darts has been lost. Accept the situation and work with the professional side of the game to get the amatuer side's house in order. There is no need any longer for division - people need to remember it wasn't Barry Hearn who caused the split in darts, it was the players who felt they could no longer earn a living. Had Olly Croft put his own pride and ego at the door it might never have gotten to this stage but here we are, 25 years down the line, and the lessons still haven't been learned.
Agreed - there is a pro setup in Matchroom which has offered to help with management and investment and although he doesn't say it directly I think that was what Adams is getting at. Why would the BDO need to approach Hearn about moving the worlds if not to cooperate in some kind of reunification? It would just move it to Easter without consulting anyone. If you read between the lines I think what Adams is saying is to accept that the war for pro darts has been lost and to cooperate with Hearn to get the BDO moving again. And I agree with him entirely - Hearn has money to invest and expertise to offer, why on earth wouldn't you want to take advantage of that?Paddy McGinty wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:43 pmAdams may be right but although he has been one of the greatest dart players of all time he would not be a suitable person to run the BDO.Murphio wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:33 pm Very difficult to fathom how someone who has taken the BDO to the brink of collpase still appears to have pockets of support. I know we all like a bit of banter and sometimes it's fun to poke fun at their ineptitude but I don't want to see the BDO disappear and I believe that goes for the vast majority of darts fans. I also think there is room for the two World Championships to coexist even if one drops 'professional' from the title and works in tandem with the PDC to reuinfy the sport, perhaps, under the WDF umbrella. Adams is correct - the battle for pro darts has been lost. Accept the situation and work with the professional side of the game to get the amatuer side's house in order. There is no need any longer for division - people need to remember it wasn't Barry Hearn who caused the split in darts, it was the players who felt they could no longer earn a living. Had Olly Croft put his own pride and ego at the door it might never have gotten to this stage but here we are, 25 years down the line, and the lessons still haven't been learned.
Nice to have a billionaire on here! Spend some of your fortunes on reviving the BDO!NvH wrote:So am I (well not directly as I don't live in his constituency), but the last election was the easiest choice I've ever had to make.
Haha I'm not even a millionaire, but I'm far too well-versed in politics to fall for the "free stuff for everyone!" emanating from Labour's manifesto. It helps that Corbyn and his acolytes are as thick as shit, nasty and have friends in all the wrong places.
I know - far better just go with Brexit, austerity, benefit cuts, homelessness, unemployment, food banks, universal credit and all the other wonderful things the Tories have delivered. Bravo.NvH wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:28 pmHaha I'm not even a millionaire, but I'm far too well-versed in politics to fall for the "free stuff for everyone!" emanating from Labour's manifesto. It helps that Corbyn and his acolytes are as thick as shit, nasty and have friends in all the wrong places.
If Labour don't elect a leader closer to the centre ground, they won't be winning a general election for some time. Like all empty vessels, they'll continue to make the most noise, however
You should probably stick to posting about darts. All three of the main party leaders at the time were against Brexit, but it happened anyway. When we first joined the EU (EEC as it was), it was actually Labour who were against it.Murphio wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:38 pmI know - far better just go with Brexit, austerity, benefit cuts, homelessness, unemployment, food banks, universal credit and all the other wonderful things the Tories have delivered. Bravo.NvH wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:28 pmHaha I'm not even a millionaire, but I'm far too well-versed in politics to fall for the "free stuff for everyone!" emanating from Labour's manifesto. It helps that Corbyn and his acolytes are as thick as shit, nasty and have friends in all the wrong places.
If Labour don't elect a leader closer to the centre ground, they won't be winning a general election for some time. Like all empty vessels, they'll continue to make the most noise, however
And still no one voted Labour which tells you everything anyone needs to know about their batshit crazy policies at the last election.Murphio wrote:I know - far better just go with Brexit, austerity, benefit cuts, homelessness, unemployment, food banks, universal credit and all the other wonderful things the Tories have delivered. Bravo.NvH wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:28 pmHaha I'm not even a millionaire, but I'm far too well-versed in politics to fall for the "free stuff for everyone!" emanating from Labour's manifesto. It helps that Corbyn and his acolytes are as thick as shit, nasty and have friends in all the wrong places.
If Labour don't elect a leader closer to the centre ground, they won't be winning a general election for some time. Like all empty vessels, they'll continue to make the most noise, however
You openly voted for the party of Boris Johnson, Jacob Rees Mogg and Ian Duncan Smith and describe Corbyn as 'nasty'. I find that utterly incredible so aye I'll go back to posting about darts because I have no wish to engage with that kind of stupid.NvH wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:47 pmYou should probably stick to posting about darts. All three of the main party leaders at the time were against Brexit, but it happened anyway. When we first joined the EU (EEC as it was), it was actually Labour who were against it.Murphio wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:38 pmI know - far better just go with Brexit, austerity, benefit cuts, homelessness, unemployment, food banks, universal credit and all the other wonderful things the Tories have delivered. Bravo.NvH wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:28 pmHaha I'm not even a millionaire, but I'm far too well-versed in politics to fall for the "free stuff for everyone!" emanating from Labour's manifesto. It helps that Corbyn and his acolytes are as thick as shit, nasty and have friends in all the wrong places.
If Labour don't elect a leader closer to the centre ground, they won't be winning a general election for some time. Like all empty vessels, they'll continue to make the most noise, however
Unemployment, homelessness, etc, have always existed regardless of who is in charge. Austerity measures appear to have ended, although the huge national debt should be a concern.
But you know, perhaps you're right. Maybe we should have a socialist utopia, like Britain in the 1970s or Venezuela under Chavez? I'm surprised the likes of Owen Jones can show his face on TV again after defending that regime.
Murphio wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:54 pmYou openly voted for the party of Boris Johnson, Jacob Rees Mogg and Ian Duncan Smith and describe Corbyn as 'nasty'. I find that utterly incredible so aye I'll go back to posting about darts because I have no wish to engage with that kind of stupid.NvH wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:47 pmYou should probably stick to posting about darts. All three of the main party leaders at the time were against Brexit, but it happened anyway. When we first joined the EU (EEC as it was), it was actually Labour who were against it.Murphio wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:38 pmI know - far better just go with Brexit, austerity, benefit cuts, homelessness, unemployment, food banks, universal credit and all the other wonderful things the Tories have delivered. Bravo.NvH wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:28 pmHaha I'm not even a millionaire, but I'm far too well-versed in politics to fall for the "free stuff for everyone!" emanating from Labour's manifesto. It helps that Corbyn and his acolytes are as thick as shit, nasty and have friends in all the wrong places.
If Labour don't elect a leader closer to the centre ground, they won't be winning a general election for some time. Like all empty vessels, they'll continue to make the most noise, however
Unemployment, homelessness, etc, have always existed regardless of who is in charge. Austerity measures appear to have ended, although the huge national debt should be a concern.
But you know, perhaps you're right. Maybe we should have a socialist utopia, like Britain in the 1970s or Venezuela under Chavez? I'm surprised the likes of Owen Jones can show his face on TV again after defending that regime.
Corbyn and his rabid supporters ARE nasty, especially when it comes to them Jews. Although Corbyn has plenty of time for his terrorist friends of course.Murphio wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:54 pmYou openly voted for the party of Boris Johnson, Jacob Rees Mogg and Ian Duncan Smith and describe Corbyn as 'nasty'. I find that utterly incredible so aye I'll go back to posting about darts because I have no wish to engage with that kind of stupid.NvH wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:47 pmYou should probably stick to posting about darts. All three of the main party leaders at the time were against Brexit, but it happened anyway. When we first joined the EU (EEC as it was), it was actually Labour who were against it.Murphio wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:38 pmI know - far better just go with Brexit, austerity, benefit cuts, homelessness, unemployment, food banks, universal credit and all the other wonderful things the Tories have delivered. Bravo.NvH wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:28 pmHaha I'm not even a millionaire, but I'm far too well-versed in politics to fall for the "free stuff for everyone!" emanating from Labour's manifesto. It helps that Corbyn and his acolytes are as thick as shit, nasty and have friends in all the wrong places.
If Labour don't elect a leader closer to the centre ground, they won't be winning a general election for some time. Like all empty vessels, they'll continue to make the most noise, however
Unemployment, homelessness, etc, have always existed regardless of who is in charge. Austerity measures appear to have ended, although the huge national debt should be a concern.
But you know, perhaps you're right. Maybe we should have a socialist utopia, like Britain in the 1970s or Venezuela under Chavez? I'm surprised the likes of Owen Jones can show his face on TV again after defending that regime.
IslamophobiaNvH wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 2:46 pmCorbyn and his rabid supporters ARE nasty, especially when it comes to them Jews. Although Corbyn has plenty of time for his terrorist friends of course.Murphio wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:54 pmYou openly voted for the party of Boris Johnson, Jacob Rees Mogg and Ian Duncan Smith and describe Corbyn as 'nasty'. I find that utterly incredible so aye I'll go back to posting about darts because I have no wish to engage with that kind of stupid.NvH wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:47 pmYou should probably stick to posting about darts. All three of the main party leaders at the time were against Brexit, but it happened anyway. When we first joined the EU (EEC as it was), it was actually Labour who were against it.Murphio wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:38 pmI know - far better just go with Brexit, austerity, benefit cuts, homelessness, unemployment, food banks, universal credit and all the other wonderful things the Tories have delivered. Bravo.NvH wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:28 pm
Haha I'm not even a millionaire, but I'm far too well-versed in politics to fall for the "free stuff for everyone!" emanating from Labour's manifesto. It helps that Corbyn and his acolytes are as thick as shit, nasty and have friends in all the wrong places.
If Labour don't elect a leader closer to the centre ground, they won't be winning a general election for some time. Like all empty vessels, they'll continue to make the most noise, however
Unemployment, homelessness, etc, have always existed regardless of who is in charge. Austerity measures appear to have ended, although the huge national debt should be a concern.
But you know, perhaps you're right. Maybe we should have a socialist utopia, like Britain in the 1970s or Venezuela under Chavez? I'm surprised the likes of Owen Jones can show his face on TV again after defending that regime.
It isn't my side who wants people to lose their job and destroy their life because they made an inappropriate comment on social media. Now THAT is nasty, wouldn't you agree?
It isn't my side who think that you can simply wake up one morning and change your sex or be "gender fluid". Do I like Rees-Mogg and IDS? Not particularly, but this is what the idiots on the left deserve for pushing their nonsensical agenda too far. I'm sure they can do basic maths, unlike Diane Abbott.
But fine, back to the darts it is. You actually know something about the arrows. It's not like you could offer any real counter-arguments to my points, just blurt out "unemployment", "homelessness", as if these never happened under Labour.