PDPA players pension pot idea
PDPA players pension pot idea
Just listened to Wayne Mardle's podcast interview - he had an idea that in my opinion is a very good one.
The PDPA take their 2% take of prize money already - for me this is too high and would rather see a £1k threshold put in place to help lower ranked players. His idea is than an extra 8% (rounding it up to 10%) is put into a pot that is released when a player retires / loses their tour card.
Mardle noted that he retired early at 38 and that he was lucky that he had a contract with Sky to fall back on as well as a lucrative exhibition circuit. Clearly not many people will have this behind them and with more and more events and travelling needed than when the likes of Taylor and Priestley were up and coming, there will be less and less players competing in their 40s and 50s.
Like with other sports, professionals need to 'make hay while the sun shines', but also requires close financial management to last their wealth into their later years (or in crises such as the coronavirus). It would also make it a bit more efficient for tax reasons.
Michael van Gerwen turned 30 last year. Is he going to be doing this for another 15 years? He has won over £8.1m in prize money since the tour card came in, in 2011. He would've contributed £162k in PDC levies and would have £648k in the retirement pot up until now.
Corey Cadby has fallen off the tour for his own reasons. He would've contributed £1.5k in PDPA levies since being rewarded his tour card, but would have over a £6k nest egg which would tie him over for a bit.
The PDPA take their 2% take of prize money already - for me this is too high and would rather see a £1k threshold put in place to help lower ranked players. His idea is than an extra 8% (rounding it up to 10%) is put into a pot that is released when a player retires / loses their tour card.
Mardle noted that he retired early at 38 and that he was lucky that he had a contract with Sky to fall back on as well as a lucrative exhibition circuit. Clearly not many people will have this behind them and with more and more events and travelling needed than when the likes of Taylor and Priestley were up and coming, there will be less and less players competing in their 40s and 50s.
Like with other sports, professionals need to 'make hay while the sun shines', but also requires close financial management to last their wealth into their later years (or in crises such as the coronavirus). It would also make it a bit more efficient for tax reasons.
Michael van Gerwen turned 30 last year. Is he going to be doing this for another 15 years? He has won over £8.1m in prize money since the tour card came in, in 2011. He would've contributed £162k in PDC levies and would have £648k in the retirement pot up until now.
Corey Cadby has fallen off the tour for his own reasons. He would've contributed £1.5k in PDPA levies since being rewarded his tour card, but would have over a £6k nest egg which would tie him over for a bit.
Re: PDPA players pension pot idea
Surely any sensible self employed person needs to be making their own pension arrangements. You cant hold everyones hand ffs.
Big Jock Knew
Re: PDPA players pension pot idea
The PDC are greedy bastards and should pay all the players a pension.
Des Jacklin: ‘People say the BDO can’t compete with the PDC, but that is the biggest load of crap in the world’
God rest Alf Garnett and Prince Phil.
I used to love cycling but unfortunately I know a man who doesn’t like cyclists.
God rest Alf Garnett and Prince Phil.
I used to love cycling but unfortunately I know a man who doesn’t like cyclists.
-
- International
- Posts: 18554
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:10 pm
Re: PDPA players pension pot idea
Hearn doesnt own players a pension
TSOD World Grand Prix Prediction winner 2017.
"Who gives a shit" - Borespark about every Darts event since 2021
"Who gives a shit" - Borespark about every Darts event since 2021
Re: PDPA players pension pot idea
When it comes to handing out piddly fines for posting on social media or having a few too many, the line is "They are essentially employees, no employer would allow their staff to... blah blah"
When it comes to things like this, players are self employed and on their own.
When it comes to things like this, players are self employed and on their own.
"Deserved Better"
GM, 2021.
GM, 2021.
Re: PDPA players pension pot idea
Rout hates the PDC, episode 10003456774322212233........
Des Jacklin: ‘People say the BDO can’t compete with the PDC, but that is the biggest load of crap in the world’
God rest Alf Garnett and Prince Phil.
I used to love cycling but unfortunately I know a man who doesn’t like cyclists.
God rest Alf Garnett and Prince Phil.
I used to love cycling but unfortunately I know a man who doesn’t like cyclists.
Re: PDPA players pension pot idea
Putting money aside is a good idea but there is nothing stopping players doing this already and probably with more tax efficient options given players live all over.
Not sure players would want that choice taken away by swallowing up up to 10% of earnings.
It also wouldn't be a pension if drawn on immediately. It would just be a rainy day fund at best and if the premise is supporting players on retirement it shouldn't be available all at once but rather drawn down on to further protect the players from spaffing it away.
The idea of savings is good but feel this is best left to players. Not only would any sort of fund incur additional admin costs in top of the amounts but it also is not going to maximise each players own circumstances.
Not sure players would want that choice taken away by swallowing up up to 10% of earnings.
It also wouldn't be a pension if drawn on immediately. It would just be a rainy day fund at best and if the premise is supporting players on retirement it shouldn't be available all at once but rather drawn down on to further protect the players from spaffing it away.
The idea of savings is good but feel this is best left to players. Not only would any sort of fund incur additional admin costs in top of the amounts but it also is not going to maximise each players own circumstances.
Re: PDPA players pension pot idea
£12 Million in prize money was won by PDPA members in 2019 the fund would be rather large in a few years as it would be growing at over a million a year at 10%.
I doubt anyone within the PDPA is suitable qualified to invest this fund. So someone would have to be foudn who could give at least an equal return on payers investment that the normal pension firms can do.
Before long the PDPA would be an attractive take over target for some unscrupulous person(s) to get hold of this amount
Does darts and professional dart players really need this ?
I doubt anyone within the PDPA is suitable qualified to invest this fund. So someone would have to be foudn who could give at least an equal return on payers investment that the normal pension firms can do.
Before long the PDPA would be an attractive take over target for some unscrupulous person(s) to get hold of this amount
Does darts and professional dart players really need this ?
Re: PDPA players pension pot idea
Any large pool of money is an attractive target, including every pension fund in the world. That's not a reason not to have some kind of retirement fund.el_ringo wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:30 pm £12 Million in prize money was won by PDPA members in 2019 the fund would be rather large in a few years as it would be growing at over a million a year at 10%.
I doubt anyone within the PDPA is suitable qualified to invest this fund. So someone would have to be foudn who could give at least an equal return on payers investment that the normal pension firms can do.
Before long the PDPA would be an attractive take over target for some unscrupulous person(s) to get hold of this amount
Does darts and professional dart players really need this ?
Simply offering a pension would be reasonable, even if optional. Make it opt-out rather than opt-in, because opt-out means people have to go to some trouble not to save.
If they want to make it lift all boats, rather than being a simple group fund, that's a different discussion.
Re: PDPA players pension pot idea
If they choose to retire then they ought to have thought through how they will continue to fund themselves. If they lose their card, does that not mean they're effectively losing their "job" for non-performance?
If I were a profitable player, I think I'd be miffed at giving up 10% of what I would have won in order to bail out those who aren't profitable or aren't being responsible for their own futures.
If I were a profitable player, I think I'd be miffed at giving up 10% of what I would have won in order to bail out those who aren't profitable or aren't being responsible for their own futures.
Re: PDPA players pension pot idea
I dont think anyone is advocating players give up 10% to bail out others, are they?TheVillan wrote:If they choose to retire then they ought to have thought through how they will continue to fund themselves. If they lose their card, does that not mean they're effectively losing their "job" for non-performance?
If I were a profitable player, I think I'd be miffed at giving up 10% of what I would have won in order to bail out those who aren't profitable or aren't being responsible for their own futures.
When work take out money of my salary every month for my pension its only for my own, not for anyone else.
Big Jock Knew
Re: PDPA players pension pot idea
It's a non-starter, at least as a compulsory measure. Of the 128 tour card holders, probably 70 of them are either running at a loss or just about covering costs with their tournament winnings. There'd probably be another 10-15 or so who'd find it difficult to manage without the extra 8% now. So we're more or less down to the top 40 or so before we start.
It also makes the assumption that players are too stupid to put a bit of money aside, or that they'd have no earning potential after retirement.
It also makes the assumption that players are too stupid to put a bit of money aside, or that they'd have no earning potential after retirement.
aka JRWFSL147
Bitter and hardened heart...
Bitter and hardened heart...
Re: PDPA players pension pot idea
My initial interpretation was of a communal hardship fund but tbh having re-read it this is just more like a traditional savings scheme. Not sure why the PDPA would want to get involved past general advice of "get a financial adviser".
-
- Brass Darts
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2020 10:54 am
Re: PDPA players pension pot idea
There is merit in the idea. I'd see it working like the Professional Cricketers Association. The contribution is not towards a pension as such but as a way to support players adjust to life away from darts. For example, funding training / education, player welfare and so on. It could also be used to give them a united voice (I have no idea if there is a current union / collective for players) with regards to how the game goes forward.
Would also be beneficial in offering education related to being a professional especially to those new to the PDA.
As for a pension, better off sorting your own stuff out. Sure, there is a case for a collective fund but with the differences in amounts won individual plans are better.
Would also be beneficial in offering education related to being a professional especially to those new to the PDA.
As for a pension, better off sorting your own stuff out. Sure, there is a case for a collective fund but with the differences in amounts won individual plans are better.
I am a man from Cork
Bo selecta has great norks
Des found me deep
And bo does she seep
So all three did bork
Bo selecta has great norks
Des found me deep
And bo does she seep
So all three did bork