Skewball wrote:The PDC accounts make interesting reading
Turnover up by approx 14 % over 2009, in this day and age thats good BUT
Gross profit up just 0.008% over 2009, 16,000 increase from 1,300,000 increase in turnover
Despite this the dividend paid out to shareholders up 33.3 % from 300,000 to 400,000 ( 44% of profit, nice work if you can get it )
Blimey, are you a Sun Journo?! thats such a biased statement!!
I would put a fairer slant and say that the increase in TO was all ploughed back into Prize money, hence the no change in Gross Margin. SO not bad news at all.
AND, you completely ignore the £250k fall in admin expenses and therefore
£210k increase in
Net profit, all of which more than pays for the increase in Dividends.
And overall reserves have climbed nearly £500k.
Also I don't entirely agree with the 'borrowed' statement re Matchroom statement. The PDC made a profit in transactions with Matchroom and although the balance (what you called 'borrowed') is owed at the year end we actually have no idea what the timings were.
Just giving the full picture (which you have not!). I will certainly take your future posts with an ENOURMOUS pich of salt
Blimey, are you a Sun Journo?! thats such a biased statement!!
wait you used that one
You think I was finding fault.......... I wasnt, I wasnt criticising either, I said I found them interesting reading.
For any company to increase turnover so much and increase gross profit so little is interesting... at least to me, which is what I stated. Yes prize money did increase but the 1.3 million is turnover not profit, and if the difference is prize money then I think its a risk for any company whatever their business to plough so much back percentage wise into outgoings but not necessarily wrong, in the current climate.
Also concerning the admin savings.... fantastic.... but to give it to themselves as shareholders????why not put this into the prize fund or into a ladies tour or whatever. just seems a big increase in dividend in the current fininacial situation.
On the note of the matchroom debt, if it was part of normal day to day business then there would be no need to make a special note about it. There is 1.2 million from trade debtors but no details given in special notes. So why this?
I wasnt trying to give a detailed view of anything, which is just as well as I would have fallen well short of that, I was just pointing out some things I found interesting.