ifm wrote:
How easy was it to come up with that answer?
1. easy
2. really easy
3. i didn't even need to think about it
4. the answer just appeared in front of my eyes
Plenty of people would struggle with these.
I gather you have an IQ in the 140s?
130's but you are missing something
I'm lost.
Feel free to enlighten me.
And the rest of us with sub 130 IQs.
Au contraire John.
I did a supervised Mensa test at 10 years old, and achieved a score of 134.
Been meaning to do another one now I am older, see if things have changed
Don't get me started Neil. I am an avid cryptic crossword fan.
Anyway a couple of relatively easy ones.
Might many miss the point. (3 letters)
Propensity to hold launches (5 letters)
And another 2:
Small matter of sponge dessert (6 letters)
Insignificant player seen with broker (4 letters)
the last 2 are
trifle
pawn
Yes, well done.
...............
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
BlueSpark wrote:
Only just seen this thread.
Anymore John?
Don't get me started Neil. I am an avid cryptic crossword fan.
Anyway a couple of relatively easy ones.
Might many miss the point. (3 letters)
Propensity to hold launches (5 letters)
And another 2:
Small matter of sponge dessert (6 letters)
Insignificant player seen with broker (4 letters)
the last 2 are
trifle
pawn
Yes, well done.
...............
Just shows even with an IQ in excess of 130, you can still be so much up your own arse that you are oblivious to every one and everything else.
BlueSpark posted his answer at 8.35pm, and despite your ridicule of him because Garry's post was timed at 8.19pm, because he is on pre mod that post was not approved until 8.45pm.
ssjsa wrote:
Don't get me started Neil. I am an avid cryptic crossword fan.
Anyway a couple of relatively easy ones.
Might many miss the point. (3 letters)
Propensity to hold launches (5 letters)
And another 2:
Small matter of sponge dessert (6 letters)
Insignificant player seen with broker (4 letters)
the last 2 are
trifle
pawn
Yes, well done.
...............
Just shows even with an IQ in excess of 130, you can still be so much up your own arse that you are oblivious to every one and everything else.
BlueSpark posted his answer at 8.35pm, and despite your ridicule of him because Garry's post was timed at 8.19pm, because he is on pre mod that post was not approved until 8.45pm.
Expect an apology to Neil imminently.
OMG you are dumb, it's what made it funny, you can't tell when it was approved, now get from up Neils arse
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
Just shows even with an IQ in excess of 130, you can still be so much up your own arse that you are oblivious to every one and everything else.
BlueSpark posted his answer at 8.35pm, and despite your ridicule of him because Garry's post was timed at 8.19pm, because he is on pre mod that post was not approved until 8.45pm.
Expect an apology to Neil imminently.
OMG you are dumb, it's what made it funny, you can't tell when it was approved, now get from up Neils arse
No, you can't, but I can.
So in summary, despite you being unaware of the timing of the approval, you were only joking?
Just shows even with an IQ in excess of 130, you can still be so much up your own arse that you are oblivious to every one and everything else.
BlueSpark posted his answer at 8.35pm, and despite your ridicule of him because Garry's post was timed at 8.19pm, because he is on pre mod that post was not approved until 8.45pm.
Expect an apology to Neil imminently.
OMG you are dumb, it's what made it funny, you can't tell when it was approved, now get from up Neils arse
No, you can't, but I can.
So in summary, despite you being unaware of the timing of the approval, you were only joking?
Oh FFS, seriously?
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
Just shows even with an IQ in excess of 130, you can still be so much up your own arse that you are oblivious to every one and everything else.
BlueSpark posted his answer at 8.35pm, and despite your ridicule of him because Garry's post was timed at 8.19pm, because he is on pre mod that post was not approved until 8.45pm.
Expect an apology to Neil imminently.
OMG you are dumb, it's what made it funny, you can't tell when it was approved, now get from up Neils arse
No, you can't, but I can.
So in summary, despite you being unaware of the timing of the approval, you were only joking?
Oh FFS, seriously?
Let's address the elephant in the room.
Attachments
412FZTXJxmL._SY400_.jpg (22.89 KiB) Viewed 3964 times
For all of us not as "smart" as IFM claims to be, can someone explain to me how IFM has not fucked up yet again. ?
Cos it looks like he is trying to have a pop at bluespark for replying in the thread not when the post made by me was not on the board as it was awaiting approval.
Seems to me IFM was wrong yet again and we all know he wont ever admit he is wrong even when it is glaringly obvious.
i am so sorry for my actions these last ten years, i'm going through a tough time
Garry Murphy wrote:For all of us not as "smart" as IFM claims to be, can someone explain to me how IFM has not fekked up yet again. ?
Cos it looks like he is trying to have a pop at bluespark for replying in the thread not when the post made by me was not on the board as it was awaiting approval.
Seems to me IFM was wrong yet again and we all know he wont ever admit he is wrong even when it is glaringly obvious.
The thing is my having to explain that the fact it looked like he had simply copied your answer just demonstrates how thick you are, remember the casual viewer wouldn't know your post didn't appear till afterwards, geddit?
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
ssjsa wrote:
Just shows even with an IQ in excess of 130, you can still be so much up your own arse that you are oblivious to every one and everything else.
BlueSpark posted his answer at 8.35pm, and despite your ridicule of him because Garry's post was timed at 8.19pm, because he is on pre mod that post was not approved until 8.45pm.
Expect an apology to Neil imminently.
OMG you are dumb, it's what made it funny, you can't tell when it was approved, now get from up Neils arse
No, you can't, but I can.
So in summary, despite you being unaware of the timing of the approval, you were only joking?
Oh FFS, seriously?
Let's address the elephant in the room.
hmmm.jpg (10.31 KiB) Viewed 3939 times
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
Garry Murphy wrote:For all of us not as "smart" as IFM claims to be, can someone explain to me how IFM has not fekked up yet again. ?
Cos it looks like he is trying to have a pop at bluespark for replying in the thread not when the post made by me was not on the board as it was awaiting approval.
Seems to me IFM was wrong yet again and we all know he wont ever admit he is wrong even when it is glaringly obvious.
The thing is my having to explain that the fact it looked like he had simply copied your answer just demonstrates how thick you are, remember the casual viewer wouldn't know your post didn't appear till afterwards, geddit?
Sparky had already answered the one question before I approved garry's post.
Garry Murphy wrote:For all of us not as "smart" as IFM claims to be, can someone explain to me how IFM has not fekked up yet again. ?
Cos it looks like he is trying to have a pop at bluespark for replying in the thread not when the post made by me was not on the board as it was awaiting approval.
Seems to me IFM was wrong yet again and we all know he wont ever admit he is wrong even when it is glaringly obvious.
The thing is my having to explain that the fact it looked like he had simply copied your answer just demonstrates how thick you are, remember the casual viewer wouldn't know your post didn't appear till afterwards, geddit?
Sparky had already answered the one question before I approved garry's post.
Yes i know, thankfully now the casual reader knows too.
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
"it's the same trolls spouting the same crap every other post.... you have to be some kind of sad act to watch nearly 8 hours of darts a day for 9 days just to post about how crap it is"
