Question for the statisticians
Re: Question for the statisticians
Can the deluxe one be bumped please. Sure I was swayed at 1st then it all began to unravel in glorious fashionBlueSpark wrote:After the bumping of the Turkish open draw thread, this one my all time favourite (apart from the Deluxe one, obvs)
Enjoy.
Hot Potatoes: the very best of Devo.
Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=15568devosteve wrote:Can the deluxe one be bumped please. Sure I was swayed at 1st then it all began to unravel in glorious fashionBlueSpark wrote:After the bumping of the Turkish open draw thread, this one my all time favourite (apart from the Deluxe one, obvs)
Enjoy.
Big Jock Knew
Re: Question for the statisticians
Can't believe I'd forgotten about this. Bloody lovely read.Ginge wrote:Oh boy, what a read.
Rout and IFM just lost the plot completely. Any idea where they got the lunatic 3 million to 1 figure in the first place?
Trying to explain even the simplest probability calculation was like trying to explain how to programme your video to a pot plant.
Them trying to refute some rather complex, yet elegant maths was just hysterical!
Great bumping.
Re: Question for the statisticians
My second favourite thread, the other one reminded me of it.
Utterly brilliant.
Utterly brilliant.
Re: Question for the statisticians
Bumpfest at the moment.
Re: Question for the statisticians
Indeed. But specially selected "classics" that need a good airing every now and again.ChrisW wrote:Bumpfest at the moment.
I think this one is my favourite for so many different reasons.
Re: Question for the statisticians
26scored wrote:David owning everyone in this thread.
Fair play.
Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians
Yes, it's definitely a favourite of mine. It's just so blatantly obvious it was fixed, across 4 different draws. When you have such ridiculas odds , beyond calculation combined with a clear and obvious motive then it's just beyond debate. It was fixed, there is no other option.DavidOwen67 wrote:Indeed. But specially selected "classics" that need a good airing every now and again.ChrisW wrote:Bumpfest at the moment.
I think this one is my favourite for so many different reasons.
Yet people were trying to pretend it wasn't just to protect their image on here.
It was so weird.
Re: Question for the statisticians
God, I miss that guy.Booji Boy wrote:Jeezo when you are getting your arse handed to you by david owen, david owen ffs, its time to question your future on forums.
What a fun read.
Re: RE: Re: Question for the statisticians
Aye it was a bit odd, as if the PDC were fixing it so that two nobodies played each other each day over a three day weekendSkewball wrote:Yes, it's definitely a favourite of mine. It's just so blatantly obvious it was fixed, across 4 different draws. When you have such ridiculas odds , beyond calculation combined with a clear and obvious motive then it's just beyond debate. It was fixed, there is no other option.DavidOwen67 wrote:Indeed. But specially selected "classics" that need a good airing every now and again.ChrisW wrote:Bumpfest at the moment.
I think this one is my favourite for so many different reasons.
Yet people were trying to pretend it wasn't just to protect their image on here.
It was so weird.
Big Jock Knew