PDC Women's Series 2022

[Case]

they are shit no matter what code they play in.

I like see your throw 107 avg and still opponent wins 3 legs

Like all brainwashed simpletons you pick out the sole average of over 100 but conveniently ignore the consecutive averages of 66, 67, 68 etc
and for further reference , should you insist of trying to engage me in future might I suggest you use proper English in your posts you dyslexic retarded cunt.

Was the final, lots at stake, she's a brilliant player no doubt.

Her surge through these tournaments was Taylor/MvG-esque, disregarding the first 12? chances at winning something as well, amazing.

[Black Velvet]

Random spacing around punctuation, there.

[1205]

Let’s be honest, she has a decent chance of winning a couple of games if she plays anything close to what she has.
A far better player than Sherrock ever has been. Only a teenager ffs

Yes, Sherrock never done anything (apart from her World Trophy win, reaching a Women's World final, a few half-decent PDC stage games and top 2 180 records in the Women's Series, and previously the highest average in a Women's Series final.)

When Sherrock is good, she's really good. In fact she was playing well against Greaves.
After 7 legs against Greaves in WS19 Sherrock was averaging 96.92. But she'd had 2 chances for 12 darters to break and didn't even get a dart at a double.

At 2-2 Sherrock was 100 after 9 darts. 20, 20, 20 to leave tops. Greaves took out 64 in 2.
At 3-3 Sherrock was 181 after 6, and hit 60 next dart to be on 121 after 7. 20, 20, 15, 7 (missed t16 and 16) to lose the dart at the bull, 19 to leave tops. Greaves took out 148.
Sherrock had had 2 chances for 12 darters to break and didn't even get a dart at a double.
Roar from the people watching the nearby screen.
Maybe she remembered Greaves' comeback from 3-0 down against her at the Welsh Open.
She imploded.
40, 42, 11, 43. Greaves 11 darter to break and win but could probably have taken 31.

[Black Velvet]

Brace yourself.

[BlueSpark]

Wow

[Rout]

they are shit no matter what code they play in.

I like see your throw 107 avg and still opponent wins 3 legs

and for further reference , should you insist of trying to engage me in future might I suggest you use proper English in your posts you dyslexic retarded cunt.

This might be my favourite ever post on here. Just wonderful.

[ChrisW]

Brilliant!

[oche balboa]

they are shit no matter what code they play in.

I like see your throw 107 avg and still opponent wins 3 legs

Like all brainwashed simpletons you pick out the sole average of over 100 but conveniently ignore the consecutive averages of 66, 67, 68 etc
and for further reference , should you insist of trying to engage me in future might I suggest you use proper English in your posts you dyslexic retarded cunt.

OH THE FUCKING IRONY

[Rout]

Not too long before he claims it was deliberate, I'd imagine.

[Black Velvet]

HE WAS JOKING!!!!

[1205]

Sad thing about those low average games in WS20 is that she won 4-0, 4-2, 4-0. (The 4-2 went 2-2 and then she woke up and a 17-dart break and 19-dart hold ended the game).
Once Sherrock was beaten by Suzuki, then Greaves could relax get a 102.90 and 4-1 win over Ashton.
The 102.90 was her only 100+ average, other than her other only 100+ average in WS19 against Sherrock.

[oche balboa]

She beaten Suzuki in 6 finals this year (5 Ladies Series, 1 Australian Open)

[Little Lonely Garry]

PINOCCHIO THE HUMAN PICK AXE OUT OF ALLY PALLY
TWAT PORTER WILL HAVE TO MAKE UP A NEW RULE,

and sure enough

[Dannyboy]

Surely if the women’s series is getting a big prize money upgrade (and the Asian Tour too), the development tour and Challenge Tour should be too?

I did hear that the European Tour is on for a big increase as well - maybe up to £180,000 per event next year.

[1205]

Surely if the women’s series is getting a big prize money upgrade (and the Asian Tour too), the development tour and Challenge Tour should be too?

I did hear that the European Tour is on for a big increase as well - maybe up to £180,000 per event next year.

Development Tour at least. Given a weak pound and higher costs bumping up money on the lesser tours is a good move.

[ChrisW]

Surely if the women’s series is getting a big prize money upgrade (and the Asian Tour too), the development tour and Challenge Tour should be too?

I did hear that the European Tour is on for a big increase as well - maybe up to £180,000 per event next year.

Ain't that big an increase.
Just read the note about last 64 only being paid if over 128 entries. Don't think that has happened yet.

[BlueSpark]

Surely if the women’s series is getting a big prize money upgrade (and the Asian Tour too), the development tour and Challenge Tour should be too?

I did hear that the European Tour is on for a big increase as well - maybe up to £180,000 per event next year.

Ain't that big an increase.
Just read the note about last 64 only being paid if over 128 entries. Don't think that has happened yet.

No no it’s a big increase

[Black Velvet]

Agreed

[Dannyboy]

The point I was making is that they are now putting the women's series on a par with the Challenge Tour; the latter which is of a far higher standard. There are a lot of decent non-tour card holders out there.

[Rout]

I don't know if anyone has noticed, but nay fooker is buying tickets for most PDC TV majors anymore.

They are panicking like hell and trying to find some new angle to get people interested again now that the mongs have got bored of the same old, same old.

Seems womens darts is the best they can come up with.